I must be missing something very obvious, but my nightly head doesn't work anymore.
Press "Insert" button to add <insnodes after each <br>. Now press "Delete" - only even <insare being removed. ins.length is reported properly, each <inshas "insert" class name. What a...?
What's the best way to wrap all the nodes between two nodes in DIV tags? Is it possible with the DOM? I have code similar to the following:
HTML Code:
<h3>First header</h3>
<p>First paragraph</p>
<p>Second paragraph</p>
[code].....
How can I achieve this with the DOM, without resorting to doing something like a string replace?
I have some img tags in my HTML code, and I am trying to implement some manipulation on each image. Thing is, when using document.getElementsByTagName('img'), the JS engine skips every 2nd img tag, so I get an array with only half of the deal.
View 7 Replies View RelatedConsider following html code
<p id="oliver">
<a id="oliver1" href="/oliver1/">Oliver Twist 1</a>
<a id="oliver2" href="/oliver2/">Oliver Twist 2</a>
<a id="oliver3" href="/oliver3/">Oliver Twist 3</a>
<a id="oliver4" href="/oliver4/">Oliver Twist 4</a>
</p>
Applying JavaScript to above html as following:
[Code]...
Why are anchor nodes pointing to href and text nodes pointing to [object]? As anchor and text both are objects therefore all outputs from indices 0 to 7 should be [object].
I have a div like this:
And when I run this in firebug:
It does not return the div's with the same number.:
I would like to aggrigate each div so that for example :
Is edited to:
How would this be done?
Using JQuery validation plugin, it will work in css, class='required", but I use method to validate, it will not work. The coding is below. It will skip the validation and go to server.
function saveNew(){
$("#my_form").validate({
errorLabelContainer: $("#RegisterErrors"),
rules: {
scope: { required: true }
},
messages: {scope: "scope is required" }
});
$("#my_form").submit();
}
<div id="RegisterErrors" style="display:none" ></div>
I'm using a third party to populate the table (id=roster) contents and almost each tr contains seven th or td (with no id assigned to it). I can't find a good reference or example how to write the removeChild script that can be used to target the multiple non-id assigned sixth and seventh (last child) th or td to remove them.
Also again there's several th without id that has colspan="7" attribute that is needed to be change to colspan"5". I figure I'll use replaceChild with setAttribute but not sure how I should approach the solution. So the question is how should the script be written that'll do the tricks?
I have an access database that is looked at through ADO based SQL. Each record entry in the database determines what type of content will be displayed in my page. Some records require that my script generate a certain amount of buttons and checkboxes. This amount will always differ, so I have to generate them depending on entries in the database. THe problem I have is removing the checkboxes. The buttons go quietly, no fuss, but the checkboxes don't want to play! Code:
View 9 Replies View RelatedI have the situation where I want to clear out the whole tree of nodes given a parent node. I get this to work in Firefox (where, actually, it's not necessary to traverse the whole tree) but in IE it doesn't work at all.
[Code]....
I wanted to remove the character " | " typed from keyboard on a ASPX page. But the " | " is on ASPX page which cannot be accessed. Can javascript remove the " | " listed on the ASPX page?
<td class="prog-asset"> | <a href="/global_id=002350">Video</a> | <a href="global_id=002350">Photography</a> | <a href="global_id=002350&">Press Releases</a> |
</td>
I have a list of elements like so:
[Code]...
Exactly how would one go about removing all except one of the above LI elements? Also each page refresh the left over LI element must be a randomly left over element. The last part is the one I am getting stuck on... how to make sure the left over LI element is random each time.
I keep on getting a error message from internet explorer whenever I try to remove a node from the document. This code obviously works on every other browser but internet explorer. What am I doing wrong here?
var elem = document.getElementsByTagName("div")[2];
elem.removeChild(document.getElementById("loginContent"));
elem.removeChild(document.getElementById("loginContainerLayer"));
I have the following:
[Code]...
This button should remove the current <div> and replace it with another <div>. My hide() and show() are as follows:
[Code]...
I would like to avoid using parent divs if possible; basically I would like to remove and add a div onclick. Is there a method that's comparable to removeChild, but functions as "remove()"?
I have an image inside of a div that I'd like to swap every time the function is triggered. I was able to attach first image through this: Code JavaScript: this.titlecontainer.appendChild(document.createElement('img')).src = 'images/picture' + padded_index + '-t.png';
This indeed does add another image on each function iteration but as the code suggests, it actually APPENDS additional images. Instead, I'd like to SWAP the existing image for a new one. My guess is to remove what's currently loaded inside the div prior to appending another one. What would the line preceding the above have to look like to accomplish removing of the content?
I'm trying to create something just like Gmail's attachment feature where you could add a new element (created on the fly), but could also be removed dynamicly. So a 'remove' link would also be 'created' for each field created. Code:
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have this code:
Code:
<html>
<head>
<style type='css/text'/>
splash { position:absolute; left:0px; top:0px; z-index:2 }
page { position:absolute; left:0px; top:0px; z-index:1 }
[Code]....
Why doesn't this remove the 'splash' element in half a second?
I made an image gallery, and I used a script to put them in an array, so people can browse through them using previous/next buttons. I think it may be a very oldfashioned script, but I don't know anything about javascript, and this one seemed simpler than others to modify.
I added a function that shows how many images there are and the number of the image you are seeing (photo 1/6 for example)
The problem is that the script seems to skip counting the first image, it calls the second one 'photo 1/6', doesn't allow you to go back to the first and stops at the fifth. I tried to add a window.onload function, but I think I did it wrong, or it doesnt work because of other scripts that are also loaded on the page (JqueryBeforeAfter).
Here is the script I used:
Code:
<!-- script created by : THeMaRTy -->
<!-- website: http://marty.excudo.net -->
var count=0;
var link_array = new Array();
[Code]....
I need to get the ID of all the nodes withing a DIV.
How do I do that?
I try to make something where you add elements, and can delete elements later by calling a simple function. I simplyfied it right here: It works only to add the paragraphs, but the delete function doesn't work. Tried already to debug with an alert message after each rule... but the problem is with this rule I guess:
[Code]...
is there a possibility to move a node from one child position to
another ?
I'm trying to iterate through nodes in a Selection Range, but I'm having a bit of trouble determining why all nodes in the range aren't being hit. It seems like deeply nested nodes aren't being hit for some reason.
Here's the code I'm using.
var n = startNode;
while (n) {
this.visited.push('[' + n.nodeName + ']');
if (n == endNode) {
break;
}
if (n != startNode && n.hasChildNodes()) {
n = n.firstChild;
} else {
while (!n.nextSibling) {
n = n.parentNode;
}
n = n.nextSibling;
}
}
I have two nodes with elements get by tag name.Now i want these two nodes merged in one node.ie:
list1 = document.getElementById("menu1").getElementsByTagName("a");
list2 = document.getElementById("menu2").getElementsByTagName("a");
There doesn't seem to be any mechanism to "clear" a node of all
it's children (not that its necessary very often, but I have come
across situations where I'd like to clear a node of all it's
children before appending other nodes). I've come up with two
possibilities: Code:
I try to associate DOM nodes with other objects. Assigning custom
properties to DOM nodes works in Firefox and Safari. It also works with
HTML nodes in IE6. However, it appears not to work with XML nodes that
are part of trees returned by XMLHttpRequest. How can I work around this
limitation? For XML nodes, I need to be able to associate at most one
object with each node.
The syntax I am using is
node.customproperty = value
I'm sure I'm missing something basic, but I can't seem to find what I'm looking for. If I have an xml doc where the parent node and child nodes contain elements with the same name ("name" in this case), how would I go about just getting the client's name? Here is a slimmed down version of the structure:
<client>
<name></name>
<url></url>
[code]....
function Xml_feed(file)
{
this.load = function()
{
var txt, str, title;
var threads = xml.getElementsByTagName('thread');
var len = threads.length;
var box = document.getElementById('box-a');
while (len-->0) {
txt = document.createElement('button');
title = threads[len].getElementsByTagName('title');
str = threads[len].getElementsByTagName('author');
txt.setAttribute('label', title[0].childNodes[0].nodeValue + ' by ' + str[0].childNodes[0].nodeValue);
box.appendChild(txt);
}
};
var xml = document.implementation.createDocument("","",null);
xml.onload = this.load;
try {
xml.load(file);
} catch (e) {
alert('There was a problem loading the XML file');
}
}
var feed = new Xml_feed('blah.xml');
in the red:
Is that how I should be retrieving the value from a child node? (the getElementsByTagName)..
in the blue:
I tried doing this.xml but had problems with doing that, i.e,
this.xml = document.implementation.createDocument("","",null);
this.xml.onload = this.xml.load;
try {
this.xml.load(file);
} catch (e) {
alert('There was a problem loading the XML file');
}
I'll guess that text in the red is why..
btw, this was in an XUL app.. not sure how much that would matter though..