JQuery :: Scope After AjaxForm?
Apr 4, 2011
I'm showing a form in a Simplemodal dialog in combination with ajaxForm() to redirect the resulting page to another DOM element. The success function of ajaxForm() closes the modal dialog.The resulting page in the other DOM element has no access to the jquery function $(). When I load a page using ajax into the DOM element there is no issue access the jquery function, this only happens when I redirect the resulting page from the ajaxForm() function.
View 3 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Apr 21, 2011
Simple enough. This beautiful plugin is what I"m using:[URL]..The problem is, it has no documentation on how to detect a post failure. I know these are rare, but I'd like to code defensively.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2009
Using jQuery Form Plugin on a form that submits text & file fields to a remote server, the resulting XML/JSON returned does not appear to be available to jQuery.
[Code]...
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 28, 2010
[URL] I'd also like to use this plugin, so I don't have to create complex validation rules. validation plugin [URL]Trouble is, I can't figure out how to prevent form submission without first checking to see if the form is valid. My attempts so far have been based on using submit() to prevent submission of the form if validations valid() method returns false. But this doesn't seem to work. If I use ajaxForm, the submit() function seems to work differently. A form will still be submitted, despite a return false. validate has a valid() method that returns false if the form fails validation. How can I submit the form only if valid doesn't return false?
[Code]..
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 26, 2011
I stumbled on this problem while testing StatusNet for our next release; we use jquery.form's .ajaxForm() to do various AJAX form submissions, including the primary message-sending form which includes a file upload control.
We've not seen problems before, but since upgrading from an old Form plugin version 2.17 to 2.49 a couple months ago, I've noticed our development branch no longer works properly in Opera: the actual submission goes fine, but we're unable to access the XML return data (which usually contains HTML fragments to put back into the UI).
I have a test case which demonstrates this at [URL] (source of the main page & submit handler are included there), using current jQuery 1.4.4 and jquery.form 2.52.
Under Firefox 4.0b10 and other browsers, the forms submit correctly, and we can read nodes and text out of the returned XML just fine.
But on Opera 11.00 and 10.63, the submission goes through but we get back an HTML document containing only "<head></head><body></body>". On Opera 9.63, it also includes the text "Blank page."
I tried to trace this down in jquery.form's history, and the trouble seems to have started around 2.39 with a commit ironically titled "iframe load fix (mostly for Opera)", which changes the event handling for forms submitted via iframe: from that version on, a 'load' event handler is added directly as an onload attribute on the iframe's source, whereas previously it was added with attachEvent or addEventListener.
It looks to me like the iframe is throwing a load event for the "about:blank" page, instead of for the submission.
I can revert back to 2.17 or another working version for now, but I'd like to make sure this is fixed upstream;
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 28, 2011
I'm having a problem with same origin policy protection using JQuery 1.4.4 and the jquery.form.js AJAX plug-in. I have an AJAX contact form which works fine so long as visitors preface URL's they type in with "www". But if they navigate directly to a URL on my site (not using www), the URL resolves OK but the URL doesn't match what I use in my AJAX form. In Chrome, this results in a console error:
[Code]...
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 8, 2010
How this can be done in jquery,
Let me explain the question using an example:
<html>
If you run it, the alert messageis "pic2", so jquery sees the entire document, but is there a way to easily restrict it to the sub-tree under the current node (in this case the sub-tree under the span node, since that's what was clicked)? Yes, I can do something like alert($("#div1 img:eq(1)").attr("alt")); //undefined as expected
But I am looking for a solution that's more dynamic, so I don't need to hard code #div1.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 2, 2011
New to javascript/jquery and have a question regarding scope. I want to bind an event within my class so it calls one of the class methods. The problem I run into is that the event handler is a anonymous function that runs outside the scope of the class, therefore it doesn't see the class methods or properties.
Is there a proper way to deal with this:
Sample code:
function myObject(tag) {
// properties
this.myvar = 'test';
this.tag = tag;
// methods
function sendRequest() {
alert(this.myvar);
}
// initialization
$(this.tag).click( function() {
this.sendRequest();
});}
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 19, 2010
I'm having trouble letting functions I defined in jquery read javascript global variables I defined elsewhere.. for example I have a function defined within my jquery
$(document).ready(function(){
function performTabSlide() {
// do something with currentPosition;
[code].....
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 23, 2010
I've recently started developing javascript using jQuery and so far I'm really enjoying it.Being a professional programmer (mainly C, C++, java and python) there is one thing that's been puzzling me regarding variable scope and unnamed function declarations. Let me exemplify:
------------------------
var sum = 0;
$(xmlobj).find("item").each(function(){
[code]....
View 6 Replies
View Related
Dec 22, 2011
how to manage the script scope on a full ajax application Let me explain a scenario
- Pages are loaded dynamically in a div,
- pages are php files
- pages contains scripts tags (static and generated via php) depending on
context
Load Scenario :
1. master page load pages via $.load jquery function
2. page are inserted and the script is executed (mostly input events or live events)
when i select another page (just imagine a combo with all pages listed), the Load Scenario is executed again... the 2 js code line that matter in the master page
[Code]...
View 7 Replies
View Related
Feb 14, 2011
I'm a little puzzled over the possibility of accessing an array. I've declared the previd id - in the proxy.invoke call which works just fine (we have already implemented an .each loop which also works. My problem is this - after accessing the proxy.invoke function, the previd is populated correctly with push but after the call, we cannot seem to access the previd array to make a join to a string. Here's the basics of the code.
var previd = [];
proxy.invoke("validdateIDCard", p_caregiverid,
function(validaterID) {
var valcard = validateID;
previd.push(valcard);
}, onPageError);
var finalvalue = previd.join("|"); <-- this is where the problem lies - cannot seem to read the variable...
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 16, 2011
I'm using jQuery's getJSON method to get the current date from a foreign server. I however, should this request fail (e.g. if the server is down), I want to have my page fall back to a sensible default.
What I'd like to do is this:
var date = "sensible default"
$.getJSON(url, function(data){ date = new Date(data.datetime); });
if request was successful date will contain new Date(data.datetime);
if request was unsuccessful date still contains "sensible_default"
What I have is this:
var timezone = "Europe/Berlin";
var date = "sensible_default";
$.getJSON("[URL]"+timezone+"&callback=?",
function(data){ date = new Date(data.datetime); });
alert(date);
But this produces an alert of "sensible_default", despite the fact that the getJSON request fired correctly.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 21, 2010
I've been programming in jQuery for some time now, and for the first time, I came across an issue where I am writing out the location of a TD with an ID="step" to get the innerHTML with html(). I receive a null value, but when I use td:first within the chain of elements, it works.Has anyone experienced this issue or have any idea why this is not working? I've tried other TDs with diffirent IDs within the same row, and the same null result happens.Is there a possible limitation to the numbe of IDs used within the chaining of the $() call?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jun 7, 2009
I'm trying to create an endless animation similar to a screen saver, here an image floats around the screen, fading in and out. I would like to stay out of the global namespace, so I'd like to use the callback to animate() rather than getTimeout(), which seems to operate only on functions in the global namespace. Please correct me if I'm wrong about that. But I'm having trouble maintaining the scope I want for the callback I want "this" to refer to my Animation object, not the HTML element. I understand many folks have solved this problem for events by using bind() or live(), but I am wondering how to do this for animate().
[Code]...
View 8 Replies
View Related
Sep 30, 2010
I can't use the value returned by $.post() method out of the scope of success function.
For instance in below example myvar alerted as empty even though var is alerted with a value. Besides, hide does not work in the scope of success function.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 19, 2011
got a problem with this snippet...
function writeColum () {
var x = document.getElementById("wc").value;
var y = document.getElementById("title").value;
if (event.keyCode == 32) {
[Code]...
View 7 Replies
View Related
Oct 11, 2006
I'm trying to write an 'each' function for a JavaScript array that
behaves like Ruby's Array#each. (It doesn't matter if you know Ruby to
help with this question.)
My problem is the scope of 'this' inside the iterator callback. I would
like it to be the same as the object that called the each() on the
array. Right now I have to do that with a closure or an
explicitly-passed 'this' scope. For example:
function Person( inName, inCats ) {
this.name = inName;
this.cats = inCats;
}
// Using a closure
Person.prototype.showInfo = function( ) {
var me = this;
this.cats.each( function( catName ){
alert( me.name + " owns " + catName );
} );
}
Array.prototype.each = function( inCallback ){
for ( var i=0,len=this.length; i<len; ++i ){
inCallback( this[ i ], i );
}
}
phrogz = new Person( 'Gavin', [ 'Fuzzles', 'Kitty' ] );
phrogz.showInfo( );
--Gavin owns Fuzzles
--Gavin owns Kitty
// Using an explicit scope
Person.prototype.showInfo = function( ) {
this.cats.each( this, function( catName ){
alert( this.name + " owns " + catName );
} );
}
Array.prototype.each = function( inScope, inCallback ){
for ( var i=0,len=this.length; i<len; ++i ){
inCallback.call( inScope, this[ i ], i );
}
}
Inside the each() function, arguments.callee.caller would give me a
reference to the showInfo function object. What I am looking for is a
way to access the scope of the 'this' receiver within that particular
invocation of showInfo(), so that I can use it in place of inScope
without having to pass 'this' each call.
View 9 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
If I do . . .
myForm=document.tstForm;
function initialSetup(){
myForm.fld01.value="Test 01"
myForm.fld02.value="Test 02";
myForm.fld01.focus();
}
Then, in the body tag, I do onLoad="initialSetup()",
the script doesn't work and I get a "myForm has no properties" error
I know it'll work if I move it within the function, but I figured a
global variable would retain its value within the function. Why not?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 26, 2007
In the method nextImage, I can't figure out how to access thumbs. It keeps coming back as undefined. (Using Firefox)
function runPortal(portal_number){
// there are multiple runPortals on each webpage
this.portal = document.getElementById('portal'+portal_number); // represents the div that holds the images
this.thumbs = this.portal.getElementsByTagName('a').length; // represents all the images within the div that will be rotated
this.length = this.thumbs.length; // that's how many images will be rotated
// Hide everything
for (var j=0;j<this.thumbs.length;j++){
if (j==0) continue; // Don't hide the first one
this.thumbs[j].childNodes[0].style.display = 'none'
}
this.nextImage = function (){
// there are a fixed number of images to rotate. Start over
if (this.i >= this.length){
this.i = 0;
}
// One fades away, the next appears
Effect.dglPuff(this.thumbs[this.last].childNodes[0], {duration:.6, from:.7});
Effect.Appear(this.thumbs[this.i].childNodes[0]);
// iterate to the next image for the next run
this.last = this.i;
this.i++;
}
// Set up the image rotator
// here is where I started guessing
// thumbs needs to belong to the object rotator, I guess.
this.rotator = new PeriodicalExecuter(this.nextImage, 4); // This object runs the function every 4 seconds
this.rotator.portal = document.getElementById('portal'+portal_number); // represents the div that holds the images
this.rotator.thumbs = this.rotator.portal.getElementsByTagName('a'); // represents all the images within the div that will be rotated
this.rotator.length=this.length; // that's how many images will be rotated
this.rotator.i=0; // the counter for what image we're one
this.rotator.last=0; // the counter for the previous image
}
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jul 23, 2005
Given the following working code:
function attributes() {
var attr1 = arguments[0] || '_'
var attr2 = arguments[1] || '_'
return (
function (el1, el2) {
var value1 = el1[attr1] + el1[attr2];
var value2 = el2[attr1] + el2[attr2];
if (value1 > value2) return 1;
else if (value1 < value2) return -1;
else return 0;
}
);
}
var a = [
{ a:'smith', b:'john' },
{ a:'jones', b:'bob' },
{ a:'smith', b:'jane' }
];
a.sort(attributes('a', 'b'));
for (var i =0; i < a.length; i++) {
document.write(a[i].a + ', ' + a[i].b + '<br>');
}
My question is, are attr1 and attr2 guaranteed to exist through
the lifetime of a.sort(attributes('a', 'b'))?
As I understand it, the anonymous inner function reference I am
returning is a property of attributes(). As such, when I return a
reference to the anonymous inner function, the outer attributes()
function must continue to exist (as must attr1 and att2) until
there are no further references to the inner anonymous function.
As a result, there is no danger of attr1 or attr2 "disappearing"
during the repeated calling of the anonymous inner function.
Is my explanation basically correct, or am I deluding myself and
I'm just lucky that the garbage collector hasn't recovered attr1
or attr2 while the sort is still going on? In other words, is the
behaviour I'm seeing consistent and predictable, or should I
change my approach?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 23, 2005
I have a script in which a function launched by a START button
continuously calculates and writes a value to a text box. The
calculation is done in a for loop. In the loop is a conditional that is
a global variable, a boolean. If the boolean is true, break ends the
loop (or is supposed to!). A STOP button has an onclick function that
sets the global variable to true.
What happens, though, is that the function for the STOP button is
not executed until the for loop reaches the maximum value set for i.
Anyone know how you can get one button to stop a process started by
another?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Apr 6, 2006
I had a need for a two dimentional array. Looking for this solution, I
ran accross a statement than all Javascipt arrays were arrays of
objects. So I created a function prototype, at least thats what I was
calling it:
function objRow(vartype, varaddr1, varaddr2)
{
this.type = vartype;
this.addr1 =varaddr1;
this.addr2 =varaddr2;
}
Next I did:
var myobject=new objRow("1", "1234 Main St.", "Apt 101");
At this point I was able to see myobject.addr1 or any other variable in
the object instance.
Now I added this object to a table.
var aryTestTable= new Array();
aryTestTable[0]= myobject;
At this point I could see
aryTestTable[0].addr1
Next I tried an additional object
myobject=new objRow("1", "1234 Main St.", "Apt 101"); //with
different data
And added it to the table
aryTestTable[1]= myobject;
Where I could see:
aryTestTable[1].addr2 or any other variable.
so far so good. Then I started the actual application code where I was
reading a database table and creating the objects and adding them to
the table. This was in a for loop wherein the myobject=new objRow("1",
"1234 Main St.", "Apt 101"); was instantiated.
After the for loop was finished, I could not access the data in the
table - undefined.
So my questions are: Have the my object instances popped off the stack?
and What is the alternative way to implement this table of rows of
values.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 22, 2005
I've just realized that in Mozilla pointer variables always have local scope in a function. Unlike IE. I wondered if Mozilla was able to do it in some other way? readXML() is an init() function which might be a constraint - I'm no javascript expert.
// The following won't work in Mozilla.
var record;
function readXML()
{
record=xmlDoc.getElementsByTagName("record");
}
alert(record[0].childNodes[1].firstChild.nodeValue);
View 4 Replies
View Related
Sep 8, 2006
I'm trying to access some of the global's inside my class LiveSearch
and I have no idea how to go about it. Here is what I have so far:
<script type="text/javascript" src="query.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
function LiveSearch(global) {
this.theglobal = global;
this.initialize();
}
LiveSearch.prototype.initialize = function() {
$("#thebutton").mousedown(function() { //when we click the button
alert(this.theglobal);
});
}
$(document).ready(function() {
var objSearch = new LiveSearch("globalvalue");
});
</script>
On page load I create a new LiveSearch instance and it assigns
theGlobal = "globalvalue" and proceeds to initialize(); At this point
Im using JQuery to setup an onmousedown event on a button on my page
with id="thebutton". When I click the button the alert comes back with
'undefined'. How can I get direct access to my theglobal variable? Code:
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 30, 2006
I think I've had JavaScript variable scope figured out, can you please
see if I've got it correctly?
* Variables can be local or global
* When a variable is declared outside any function, it is global
regardless of whether it's declared with or without "var"
* When it is declared inside a function, if declared with "var", it's
local, if not, it's global
* A local variable that is declared inside a function is local to the
whole function, regardless of where it is declared, e.g.:
function blah() {
for(var i ... ) {
var j ...
}}
i and j will both be visible within blah() after their declaration.
* the notion of "function" in this context also applies for this kind
of construct:
var myHandler =
{
onClickDo: function()
{
in the sense that whatever one declares inside onClickDo with "var"
will only be visible inside onClickDo. What else, am I missing anything?
View 4 Replies
View Related
