Is there a javascript or jquery effect which can simulate the effects in flash shown on this page : http://www.macrolane.fr/Temoignages/Effects are on mouseover and mouseout on the squares
View 1 RepliesI have this code http://www.jsfiddle.net/Nntc7/ created by a pdf publisher, I need to offer non flash content to users but dont know javascript and I cant get the thing to work using swfobject, How do I edit this to allow for alternative content??
View 4 Replies View RelatedI'm not sure if this is the correct forum, but here goes anyway. My QT animation has sound that goes with it and needs to be timed accurately. Anyone have any ideas what I can use and able to have it play on most browsers, mobile, etc?Just to make it a little more difficult, I need to place the animation as an overlay on top of other page elements.Flash would be a solution, but I don't want to make into flash because it won't work on iOS..This is a simple animation of stick figures and no background. If I didn't need sound I would just elect to go with a gif format which would have worked perfectly in this case.
View 2 Replies View RelatedDoing my own fitness bootcamp site and want to fancy up my front page. My front page loads a picture and I want it to load like flash. What could I do? I have all the Adobe Software, just don't know how to use it.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI need a simple javascript that I can use in my HOME page.index.html has a flash animationnoflash.html is a page without flash animationKindle does not support Flash and therefore i want to redirect my index.html to noflash.html page.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI work for a company called Best of the Best (www.botb.com). We use Flash countdown clocks to mark the end of our competitions. The issue we now have is that our clients are using mobile platforms more and more and as bloody Apple wont support flash (not fully anyway) we need the option to detect whether our users have flash and if not then replace the current <OBJECT>Blah Blah Parameters etc</OBJECT> with <DIVCLASS="NON_FLASH_CONTAINER">All other bits in middle</DIV>Is this at all possible?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to put some code together to create an image-swapping system, that when you click on the image it'll hide the image and replace it with a given iframe vimeo/youtube code...The swapping part works fine, however when the iframe loads up, it hides all other flash objects in the page, and I can't figure out why.Here's the JS
Code:
function swapvideo(w,h,url) {
document.getElementById('video_pholder').style.display='none';
[code]....
I have created no flash pages and flash pages, but instead of creating a portal at the front of the site that leads you to a flash site and a no flash site id like to do it so the page detects flash or not, and redirects to whichever URL.
Is this possible, or do multiple browsers cause problems ?
I have created a transparent flash video (virtual spokesperson) for my website. For demoing purposes, I would like to have this appear on any desired website.
This is what I am trying to produce - here a virtual spokesperson appears on the [url]website: [url]
Have a look at other sites which enable one to type in a URL and their demo virtual spokesperson appears on the given site: [url] [url]
I believe they do this within an iframe to display the underlying website.
I have been using RHS, but in IE, it sometimes doesn't work the way I expect. Also, last update was a long time ago.
So, does anyone know better alternative for RSH?
I'm looking for websites that do Flash-like things but without using Flash, only with Javascript/ajax.
I'm not looking for a particular effect, I just want examples of sites that have the coolness and eye-catching factor that Flash can have - know what I mean?
Currently I use an onbeforeunload method, to do call various tidy up
methods when a user exits my web application - however I now need to add
additional support, for users migrating to Sun's JVM.
My understanding that the onbeforeunload call is a Microsoft one, and
the net result of having it in a page used by a SUN JVM user is that the
browser does not close.
Does anyone know of an alternative to this method, that is supported
by Sun's JVM?
In my webpage I have an embedded Windows Media Player and an unordered
list with a table of contents.
When playing a video, the Windows Media Player is triggering events for
new 'chapters'.
The corresponding chapter in the unordered list is then highlighted
with css.
The list can contain up tot 100+ items. Because the page itself should
fit the screen without scrolling, i put the list in a scrolling div.
I also want the div to scroll automatically in order to keep the
current chapter inside the visible scope of the div.
Right now i do this by initually creating an anchor for each listitem.
When an chapterswitch event occurs i scroll to the corresponding
chapter with the folling line of Javascript code:
window.location = "#" + ListItemId;
There is one problem; the annoying tick sounds in IE. For my
application it is not rare to have 25 'chapters' switched in one
minute, so that's an awful lot of ticking.
I was wondering if it is possible to automatically scroll up or down to
a specific point in a div without the browser making any sounds.
I was wondering if anyone can help me? I am having some problems wit
the <noscript> tag.
I actually use it to block banner advertisements from being displaye
in my website. I have used it at the <body> tag section and look
something like this:
<noscript>
<body>
</noscript>
What it does is stop the banner advertisement offered in most fre
websites from loading.
My question is how come it does not stop the banner from loading if
was to view the webpage in my Pocket PC using Pocket Internet Explore
Pocket IE)?
Everytime I load the page in Pocket IE, it displays a standard banne
that is found in all pages viewed using Pocket IE. I looked around fo
some answers and I found out that Pocket IE found in the Pocket PC 200
does not support the <noscript> tag.
Is there another way around this? I have written some pages that wil
load in my Pocket PC and I find it very annoying to see the banne
advertisement at the top. Code:
Is there an other way to link to an element on the same page without using anchor URLs?
View 18 Replies View RelatedI was wondering if there was an addLoadEvent alternative, that could be used before all images are loaded? I think it's something like when the DOM is ready...
View 1 Replies View Relatedthis is the code I'm working on:
Code:
var tabs = new Control.Tabs('menu');
var pattern = 'tab=';
var nStr = location.href;
if(nStr.match(new RegExp (pattern,'gi'))){
var id = nStr.split(pattern);
[Code]...
It searches for the query string 'tabs=' and then splits the result to get the id of the tab. Then it uses this to set the active tab. If the url doesn't include the query string it set the tab to the first one.
The code works but it uses Eval to convert the id string (id[1]) to a variable and I was wondering if there was an alternative.
Is there a more concise way to do something like the the
desired code below?
The gripe is with the try-catch syntax. It takes *way* too
many lines of code to evaluate a conditional expression
when zero or more parts of the conditional expression may
trigger an error. In this case, the trigger is a call to
a non-defined (null) object.
In other words, how can you do a more simple 'try' statement
that simply spits out true or false, depending on whether
the 'tried' code threw an error or not?
Defining a function don't seem to work because you
can't pass the 'try' code as an argument. Extending the
'Global' constructor is not an option, so now what? Code:
Is there a possibility to do a string replace in javascript without regular experessions. It feels like using a hammer to crash an egg.
View 24 Replies View RelatedI'm working on integrating the a javascript wysiwyg editor (Xinha) with
my blog software (ExpressionEngine, aka EE). EE has extensions now so
it's easy to get the Xinha header code into the head section of the EE
web page.
But Xinha likes to use an onload command to launch:
window.onload = xinha_init;
....and EE is already using the onload command in the body tag of the web
page:
<body onLoad="document.forms[0].title.focus();set_catlink();" >
The onload command in the body tag is keeping the window.onload command
from working. At this point EE doesn't let extensions modify the body
tag.
Is there an alternative way to run the xinha_init command, without using
the window.onload command?
I have a query on browse button, In my page , i want to upload
files , But i dont want normal <input type=fileto be used for this,
so can anyone tell me anyother alternative solution for this ,
Here I have a button and textbox, if i click the button, it should
popup a file upload dialog box ,after selecting a file, that path
should be pasted in that textbox...
I want to use an anchor tag to invoke some javascript and I've read that it's bad form to use <a href="javascript:foo()">
I've read endless usenet posts and hint sites on the net, they all suggest different things and I can't get any kind of consistency, and I can't find any solution that works properly for IE, opera and mozilla.
many of the recommended solutions go something like this:
<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="foo()" />
this generates an <a> that looks like a hyperlink (good) and it invokes foo() as well (also good). the problem is that if in function foo, I put
window.location.href = "some new url";
it just seems to get ignored. If I miss out the href altogether, the link works but it's not formatted as a hyperlink.
All I'm trying to do is make something that looks like a normal hyperlink but whereby I can build the URL with some javascript rather than having it coded into the HTML, and I have to say it's driving me mad!!.
I'm looking for an alternative for .closest(). My script refers to jQuery 1.3.2 which is not the latest, but does its job. By trying to implement my code into another script I noticed that this script uses jQuery 1.2.6. Well, 'changing that version was no option'.[code]This is my code. It should be used to clone special comments containing "In[" and in some cases "text".Unfortunately .closest() doesn't work out for me. i'm looking for an alternative.
View 1 Replies View Relatedmy website tag7.ch consists of an html entry page and the main website. on the entry page there is a js menu that opens the main webpage in a new window in full screen. I love this function but browser that dont allow js doesnt have a chance to enter the main website.Do you know how the script has to be changed that there will be displayed some simple html text-links for non-js browser?greetings from switzerland,marcuswww.tag7.ch
<head>
<SCRIPT LANGUAGE="JavaScript">
function openPage(page, width, height, sBar) {
[code]....
I am currently recoding my website to perform more efficiently. By performing more efficiently I mean that I will be recoding the server side mostly.
One Particular idea I had was for select boxes. Right now for a page that lists the information for a user (say country of birth for example, which has over 200 option values) the php has to print all the values of the countries in a loop as <option></option>. The reason why it has to print them out each time is because it has to select the users country name.
Considering that there are 200+ values and there are also about 8 other select boxes that also have their information to be selected and printed thru php loop, it can get to be quite a strain on the CPU (when a bunch of users are all doing it).
So I decided to use a javascript function for each box to select the correct option value to be selected according to what the user has chosen beforehand. It generally is the same thing only the client is doing the job and not the webserver.
So what I am asking here is that should I reply on the javascript to do this? I have the paranoia that there will be some occurances where the client doens't have javascript or the version of javascript wont support the DOM features that are used to perform the job.
So for the average browser to be doing something like this, should I still be worried about this or should I go back to using the server side to handle the selected box values???
I need to detect the "name" of the constructor of an object. For example, myArray.constructor === Array is true, but I want something where that === 'Array' is true. I've heard of Object.constructor.name, but it's not widely compatible. (preferably without involving regular expressions)?
View 4 Replies View Related