I want to be able to set a property on a private object by giving the not notation path to the value. The difficulty is that this object is within closure so I can't access it directly to set the value the normal way (eg. dot.notation.path = 'new value'). This seems weird but I can't think of the obvious way.
Example:
// setter function
function set(path, change){
var privateObject = {
a: 'a',
1) is getRule a local variable or global variable, as it has no var keyword, yet it is an inner function of Validation? So without var, I think global, but being an inner function, I think local. So I'm not sure which.
2) In this line of code: var rule = $.Validation.getRule(types[type]), getRule returns rules, which is just a local variable in Validation. I always see that you return functions, but how does returning a local variable that's just an object literal and not a function be able to return true or false? Now the value of rules is an object literal, and this object returns true or false. So we are basically allowed to use return keyword with local variables that are object literals and not functions?
3) In this line, is foo(age) being called, or is it just being assigned to bar OR is it being called and THEN assigned to bar: var bar = foo(age);
4) Now for the most confusing: age is obviously an object reference as opposed to a literal in the example. Does that make a difference in regards to closures? Note that I read a number of books, including JavaScript Programmer Reference and Object Oriented JavaScript and jQuery cookbook, which compare primitives vs reference types and how primitive types store directly in memory whereas reference tpyes reference memory, so if one reference changes, they all change where primitive remains ingrained. But when assigning a function as a reference like this, how does that affect the object "age" when passed into bar?
Code: function foo(x) { var tmp = 3; return function (y) { alert(x + y + tmp); x.memb = x.memb ? x.memb + 1 : 1; alert(x.memb); }} var age = new Number(2); var bar = foo(age); // bar is now a closure referencing age. bar(10);
I'm using the standard module pattern and the problem is once you set a private variable, trying to test that object independently becomes a nightmare as the next test is polluted by the actions of the previous.So, the options are to have some reset method (which is horrible), setters on everything (defeats the point) or delete object and re-load script (hideous).
I have an object with a single Method to load content from a xml file. The problem is... how do I add a property to the object to store the data loaded?? I tryed adding a simple Array inside the object, but didn't work.
I'm attempting to change the display property of certain divs depending on the criteria of multiple select boxes.
I got it to work by GetElementsByTagName('div') but it then selects all divs rather then the select few i actually want it to work on. I tried changing the selection to GetElementsByName but this doesn't work, why i don't really know.
({}["toString"]) - function alert("toString" in {}) - true
But I want to only find a property that is defined in the object - not in a prototype.
for(var prop in {}) { alert(prop); }; // toString not found.
It seems that operator 'in' is overloaded. 'in' during iteration: look in the property. 'in' in a boolean conditional: look in the object, then up the prototype chain.
I want a way to get only properties defined within the object itself, not it's prototype. Is there no simple way?
With something like this : <form name="a"><input name="name"></form> Is it possible to get the name of the form (a) and access the input object (name) too?
I have a JS script that presents a series of "pages" with different questions inside a single HTML file, by rewriting certain <div>s. I have an object like this that contains the questions and information about answer labels etc (the idea is that this should be easy to modify for someone who doesn't know JS):
I have situation that when my page is loaded i create js object <html> ... <script> function Page() { this.page = 0; this.result = 0 this.resultCount =1; this.currentPage =1; } MyPage= Page() </script> then in my javascript function i use object like this:
function getPage() { if(!MyPage) { MyPage = new Page(); } return MyPage; }
but there is one problem: MyPage lost one of the property, currentPage. When i do alert(MyPage.cuurentPage) shows mi undefined. After object initialization everything seems to be alright, currentPage is set to 1 but when i Try use MyPage in my js code is already set to undefined. What happen? What I'm doing wrong?
I am doing javascript from a book called "Prentice Hall(which sounds very masonic) : Javascript by example".
my question is this. I am doing an practice dealing with "defining methods for an object" now i used this code verbatim
[Code]...
I did this code in the book exactly. I am just trying to warp my head around this and want to understand how is this an error when it is just the crating a new property.
I've ammended my code now so that I'm using objects, constructors and prototypes.
If I use the standard constructor.prototype.functionname = (){......} type of setup it works okay.
However I'm now experimenting with overwriting the prototype with a literal. As in the code below. i.e. constructor.prototype = {functionname : function() .......
Doing it this way my first new object instance fails. The subsequent new objects are fine.
I ran a check on the properties of the 1st object with '!hasOwnProperty and name in' and the result is that the prototype (or pointer to a prototype) is missing.
So the first new object of FontTrans (oH) has
Code: 1 property is Heading . . 9 property is Delay
I've created a small AJAX library for our application. We send the response data back as JSON in responseText. So far so good.
Before we invoke the response handler, I'm putting the eval'ed responseText in the request object like so:
Code: req.respText = eval('(' + req.responseText + ')'); This works in FF but breaks in IE 6. (*gasp*)
I finally got the Microsoft Script Editor yesterday, so I could play with the values and see what was going on. Kind of... I'm still in the dark. For some reason, it won't let me add a property to req. Can anyone explain why/how it prevents me from doing so?
Conceivably I could add the eval'ed responseText to the response handler function, but that would break the API, and would require us to modify a bunch of existing functions.
I need to acsess an object property via variables, but don't get ahead.
Example:
var property = height;
"height" is a property of the object "flower". Now, I need a possibility to access "flower.height" with my variable property, means -->"flower.property" I tried everything like "flower.[property]" "flower.['property']" etc. but nothing did help.
I'm trying to come up with a swipe gesture for part of the mobile version of my website. Right now, I'm just playing with mouse movements instead of the touch events so I can play with it on my computer rather than having to load the page up on my iPhone every time. Here's the problem: onmouseup, I run a calculation to determine where the closest element is to the edge of my container. Whichever one is the closest, I do a simple animate() to that element. It looks like this:
When I try this the button text is changed and the button is disabled, but the form doesn't submit. In IE I get an error that points to theline that says:
b.form.submit();
and the error:
Object doesn't support this property or method
What's the difference between doing this code directly in the onClick event and doing it in a function?
Hi, I am attempting to create a script in which object A contains an array of "objectb" objects. An overview of the code is posted below. When I attempt to access "myObjArr" array like this:
function JGallery(){ this.name="defaultGallery"; this.images=[{//some JSON here}] this.render=function(){
[Code].....
I've tried to debug it in firebug, but I guess there is a problem with the scope of the 'this'. The 'this' in
//i want append div with id of the name property of jgallery class $("<div></div>").appendTo("#container").attr("id",this.name); seems to refer to the iterator in the $.each().
I've tried to do this.this.name but it still doesn't work. Is there any way to allow me access the property of the Jgallery class?