Allows To Use The Browser's Native Base64 Encode / Decode
Feb 23, 2009
I could have sworn I saw a command that allows Javascripts to use the browser's native base64 encode/decode but I must be Googling for the wrong terms. Do most browsers expose these converters to javascripts's there a way to use these converters?
How would I modify this form to encode *all* the characters in the 'source' textarea to the '%xx' format & place result code into the 'output' textarea?
I want to encode and decode a javascript file in which many javascript function running. i fount lot of function decode and encode but not worrkking well .
I am building a client-side and server-side solution and want to use JSON through Ajax in both directions. I have ASP or JavaScript server-side, though Microsoft's support of server side JavaScript seems nil, so I am reluctantly conceeding to use ASP. I'd appreciate suggestions on available solutions to encode/decode JSON on the server-side (ASP or JavaScript). I don't plan to load jQuery server-side so that rules out plug-ins. I'd also like to know what is the latest client-side encode/decode for JSON. Is it built in jQuery or a plug-in? In both server and client, decoding JSON securely is key, so using eval () to decode is out.
I have a series of links in my page, all with its title atribute filled. The thing is that I don't want the browser to show this title whenever i hover those links, but still want to have mi titles in the markup Is there any way to do it?
I'm trying to send a byte array (JPG image) from javascript to a servlet for processing. I'm using Base64 to encode the byte array in javascript, and then a base64 decoder in the servlet to decode it.
The thing is, that even though the String has the same length on both sides, the decoded byte array is shorter then the original one. I've tried a couple of different implementation on both sides, with the same results.
How can I subclass a native class to get my own class with all the function of the native clas, plus correct instanceof behaviour?
The scenario I'm thinking of is something like
function MyArray() { Array.apply( this, arguments ); } MyArray.prototype = new Array(); MyArray.prototype.constructor = MyArray;
var marr = new MyArray(); marr[0] = "abc"; marr.length == 1; // true marr instanceof MyArray; // true
But this seems impossible due to the Array constructor returning a new object even when called with my own "this" in the apply() above. Can this be solved in any way?
I'd like to announce release 1.0.7 of JNEXT (JavaScript Native Extensions). JNEXT is an open source framework for securely accessing the full range of native OS resources (files, databases, sockets etc.) by using JavaScript from within a Web Page. It is light weight, cross platform, cross browser and designed with simplicity in mind....
I have tried to get an event listener to listen for when the user presses Control-D on their keyboard. This would trigger a confirm delete function - if you've ever used QuickBooks Ctrl-D is the command that does this and this is a financial application.
Problem is that in FireFox, Ctrl-D means bookmark the page and this window pops up. I want to "return false" before this happens.
On this subject I would also like to take over Ctrl-C and Ctrl-V eventually but with Ctrl-D it will work for anything. here is what I have. Again, IT WORKS, but doesn't stop the natural event (bookmark page) fromhappening:
Code:
function AddOnkeypressCommand(strCommand){ //---- version 1.0, by , last edit 2004-12-14 //add to array of commands: m_onkeypressCmds[m_onkeypressCmds.length] = strCommand;
I think my last question was not clear, so people gave me the reverse answer.
I want to put a string in an html file, and human eyes or robots will not be able to read it.
For example I want to turn this one <a href="#" onclick="this.href='http://www.google.com'">click here</a> into <a href="#" onclick="this.href=' encoded of h encoded of t encoded of t encoded of p encoded of : encoded of : encoded of / '">click here</a>
I prefer bit OR, the ^ opertaion, but ASCII is fine with me, like %40%xx%xx
This plus disable right click will make search engines and view source difficult but still possible to know where it is linked too,
Page where I'm redirecting user after 5 seconds to another page. This part of the script seems to work fine and redirects to the URL I want. However, the issue comes when I try and add parameters onto the URL. The redirect will stop working. I believe it's a formatting issue, as I've used the code in a different application. [code]...
Am I the only person who finds wildly wrong the jQuery behavior of handler invocation for native events on state-changing elements like check boxes and radio boxes?Specifically, when the user clicks a check box or a radio box, the state of the element is changed and then the handler is invoked.However, when I call"click()" on the elements, the handler is invoked *before* the element value is updated. That makes it pointlessly difficult to write handler routines that need to look at the value to know what to do.
I was wondering if there are any sites dedicated to ending javascript objects using the prototype property to give them features like trimming string, removing elements of arrays by name, removing duplicates in arrays, etc. Granted I have functions to do this but there's probably a ton of other good ones out there. Most things I've seen are frameworks like JQuery (which is awesome) but it doesn't extend these objects.
problem I'm having is that the parent url has a # sign in it, like: http://localhost/mysite/me.html#01
i need the #01 to stay in the url after the refresh, anyway to do this? i tried using escape(window.opener.location.href) but that didn't work, as it escaped everything including the :// in http://
i also tried: window.opener.location.href(window.opener.location .protocol + "//" + window.opener.location.hostname + window.opener.location.pathname);
problem with that was i lost the #01 in the url, pathname didn't include it.
There's no native linked list implementation in JS. I'm wondering if it would be worth it to implement one.
I'm using a lot of insertions and deletions with arrays of around length 5. How fast are insertions and deletions in JS native arrays compared to an optimized (but not native) linked list implementation in this situation? How about arrays of length 10?
With decoding an input box value and passing that into the url.
Basically i wrote a function that decodes a url. for example if i enter t05:34:23-79-79.003z.444z, i want it to stay like that when it goes into the url. if you use internet explorer, entering that input becomes... t05%3A34%3A23-79-79.003z.444z. on google chrome, it stays as t05:34:23-79-79.003z.444z but i need this to work on internet explorer.