References Themselves Are Passed By Value
Jul 23, 2005
Is it true that Javascript has no clone() method, to pass an object by copy of value instead of reference?
If I have an object and want to make an array out of all of its instance variables, I can loop through it and pass its values to a new array, and the class instances will be passed by copy and not by reference?
Example 9.3: References Themselves Are Passed by Value
// This is another version of the add_to_totals() function. It doesn't
// work, through, because instead of changing the array itself, it
tries to
// change the reference to the array.
function add_to_totals2(totals, x)
{
newtotals = new Array(3);
newtotals[0] = totals[0] + x;
newtotals[1] = totals[1] + x;
newtotals[2] = totals[2] + x;
totals = newtotals; // this line has no effect outside of the
function.
}
Note that this rule applies not only to pass-by-reference, but also copy-by-reference. You can modify an object through a copy of a reference, but changing the copied reference itself does not affect the object nor the original reference to the object. This is a more intuitive and less confusing case, so we don't illustrate it with an example.
View 5 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Oct 23, 2005
I'm currently engaged on a dissertation which is
investigating AJAX technologies and I was
wondering if anyone had any references that might
shed light on the subject?
I will of course carry out a literature review but
in the mean-time has anyone any (preferably print
based) sources of data on AJAX?
View 9 Replies
View Related
Dec 17, 2005
I am a bit new to JavaScript objects, I have the following object:
LinkTest=function() {
// init
}
LinkTest.prototype.eventHandler=function(){
// the call below fails, as 'this' refers to the link that
// generated the event, and not the instance of LinkTest object
this.doSomething();
}
LinkTest.prototype.register=function(link){
link.onclick = this.eventHandler;
}
LinkTest.prototype.doSomething=function() {
// do something!
}
So basically when you register a link, the onclick event handler gets a reference to LinkTest's eventHandler function. Now when the user clicks on the link, the 'this' refers to the link... how do I reference the instance of LinkTest object from within the eventHandler function?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
I discover a strange bug in Konqueror 3.1.1.
I design a javascript application which acts in one file called
example.html. At the beggining of this js i write:
if (document.images)
{
folderopen= new Image(16,16);
folderopen.src="http://www.sergioamo.8m.com/buttons/folder_open.png";
folderclose= new Image(16,16);
folderclose.src="http://www.sergioamo.8m.com/buttons/folder_close.png";
}
functions....
....
...
..
and my javascript works perfect.
If i write:
if (document.images)
{
folderopen= new Image(16,16);
folderopen.src="./buttons/folder_open.png";
folderclose= new Image(16,16);
folderclose.src="./buttons/folder_close.png";
}
functions...
....
...
..
my javascript does not work properly. Does anyone knows if is imposible
to use relative references with konqueror 3.1.1 or which is the problem?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
Apparently, there is a page with multiple frames, where one of the
frames is a "hidden" frame, and is there just to contain one or more
"fields" that are referenced from other frames.
Supposedly, if a user "sits" somewhere in this set of pages for
several minutes and then tries to do something, the page redisplays,
but an inter-frame reference (to the "hidden" frame) fails with some
sort of a "No permission" error. If the user navigates through the
site with no real delay, they don't see this problem. This is the
situation I need to understand.
I'm assuming that the "No permission" error occurs when a frame that
was obtained from domain "foo" tries to reference a frame that was
obtained from domain "bar" (I'm not sure of the correct terms in the
context of JavaScript). Under normal operation, all of the frame
contents are obtained from the same domain (I believe).
My theory is (without much information yet) that there must be a
proxy/cache server in between. When the user navigates through the
site with no delays, all of the frames are obtained from the same
server (either the cache server or the target server, I don't know
which). However, when the user "sits" for a while, I'm guessing that
the cache server hits a content timeout, and a redisplay of the page
causes one frame to be obtained from the target server, and one from
the cache server.
Does this seem like a reasonable explanation for what we might be
seeing? What are useful strategies for fixing a problem like this?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 9, 2003
I am trying to make a function that checks/unchecks a checkbox when a specific <td> is clicked. I need to use this same function for several checkboxes in the page so I want to just pass it the name of the checkbox I want to affect as a variable and use it in the object reference lines. BUT, this doesn't work. I can pass the variable to the function as I've used alert(variable) to test this. But it doesn't work when I put it in a line like this "document.forms[0].variable.checked=true;". Code:
View 4 Replies
View Related
Dec 5, 2010
is there a way to shorten something like:document.scoresheet["HomeTotalHCaps"].valueto a simple short name like var1.value ?
View 8 Replies
View Related
Feb 27, 2007
THE QUESTION: How do I get a reference to my Object when processing an
event handler bound to an html element ?
CONTEXT:
Sorry if it is a bit long.
I am developing a JS calendar tool. One of the requirements is that the
calendar will need to display a varying number of months (1..3)
depending on the calling page. Imagine 1, 2 or 3 calendar pages side by
side as required.
I have built a grid object that will contain one month's dates with the
day names at the top. The calendar object inherits the grid object as an
array of "calendar pages" - one grid per month and the calendar provides
the content for each grid. I will use the grid object for another
completely different object later and so I want to use good OOP
encapsulation. The grid is a table generated on the fly and is "dumb" as
far as what it is used for.
I have attached an onlick event to each cell of the grid. Using OOP
priciples I want the calling program (the calendar object in this case)
to provide a function to handle the click and the grid object will
provide to the calendar the row and column of that cell as well as the
grid number (so the calendar can work out which date was clicked since
it knows what the data means and the grid doesnt). Code:
View 6 Replies
View Related
Aug 11, 2009
I'm working on a project that I want the user to be able to change the color theme of the site. For some reason if I go over about 20 themes or css references it breaks the site. Any idea why this is? if so, how can I get it to accept say 50 themes?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 22, 2010
I have some confusion about the scripts below:
1) is getRule a local variable or global variable, as it has no var keyword, yet it is an inner function of Validation? So without var, I think global, but being an inner function, I think local. So I'm not sure which.
2) In this line of code: var rule = $.Validation.getRule(types[type]), getRule returns rules, which is just a local variable in Validation. I always see that you return functions, but how does returning a local variable that's just an object literal and not a function be able to return true or false? Now the value of rules is an object literal, and this object returns true or false. So we are basically allowed to use return keyword with local variables that are object literals and not functions?
3) In this line, is foo(age) being called, or is it just being assigned to bar OR is it being called and THEN assigned to bar: var bar = foo(age);
4) Now for the most confusing: age is obviously an object reference as opposed to a literal in the example. Does that make a difference in regards to closures?
Note that I read a number of books, including JavaScript Programmer Reference and Object Oriented JavaScript and jQuery cookbook, which compare primitives vs reference types and how primitive types store directly in memory whereas reference tpyes reference memory, so if one reference changes, they all change where primitive remains ingrained. But when assigning a function as a reference like this, how does that affect the object "age" when passed into bar?
Code:
(function($) {
/*Validation Singleton*/
var Validation = function() {
var rules = {
email : {
check: function(value) {
if(value)
return testPattern(value,".+@.+..+");
return true;
}, .....
$.Validation = new Validation();
})(jQuery);
Code:
function foo(x) {
var tmp = 3;
return function (y) {
alert(x + y + tmp);
x.memb = x.memb ? x.memb + 1 : 1;
alert(x.memb);
}}
var age = new Number(2);
var bar = foo(age); // bar is now a closure referencing age.
bar(10);
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 20, 2006
I've spent several days trying to work this out. Maybe I'm just
searching for the wrong keywords/phrases.
I have some code that looks like:
[-- snippet starts --]
Console = new Object();
Console.init = function() {
this.STDIN = document.getElementById('console0_stdin');
this.STDOUT = document.getElementById('console0_stdout');
// set styles on the element references, eg:
this.STDIN.style.width = ļ`%'
this.STDOUT.style.width = ļ`%'
}
Console.focus = function() {
this.STDIN.focus();
}
Console.writeln = function(buffer) {
this.STDOUT.value += "
" + buffer;
}
[-- snippet ends --]
I'm not sure why, but the Console.focus() and Console.writeln() methods
just don't seem to be able to use the DOM references stored in
Console.STDIN and Console.STDOUT. Everything's fine in the
constructor, but other methods can't seem to use them.
View 8 Replies
View Related
Sep 19, 2010
My site's working perfectly in the other browsers, and when I delete line 28 (see below) it works in IE but not exactly how I want. Is there a way to retain two jquery references on a single page in IE?
This is the head section of my code:
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 29, 2009
Is it possible to test whether two objects are equal using the data they contain inside and not comparing their pointers with ==?
Well actually of course there is but...
Is there a way to do it without actually looping through the object, instead maybe something that came with JS? (something like a .equals() method from other programming languages.)
View 5 Replies
View Related
Oct 16, 2010
I am confused about the true difference between the two below examples.
first example:
// Demonstrating a problem with closures and loops
var myArray = [āAppleā, āCarā, āTreeā, āCastleā];
var closureArray = new Array();
[code]....
Here we iterate through the length of myArray, assigning the current index of myArray to theItem variable. We declare closureArray 4 times as an anonymous function. The anonymous function in turn declares the predefined write() function, which is passed parameters. Since write() is in closureArray() a closure is created??? During each iteration, theItem is reassigned its value. The four closures reference this value. Since they reference this same value and since this value is reassigned ultimately to the value of the fourth index position, tHe time we execute closureArray later on, all four closures output the same string. This is because all four closures are within the same scope "the same environment" and therefore are referencing the same local variable, which has changed.
I have a couple of problems with this example:
1) I thought a closure is a function that is returned - the inner function is not returned above.
2) theItem is not even a local variable of the parent function (closureArray) - I thought in order for a closure to work, the inner function only accesses the local variables of the outer function, but in this case the local variable is defined OUTSIDE of the parent function.
3) the "the four closures are sharing the same environment." The thing is even in the second example, they are sharing the same environment.
Second example:
// A correct use of closures within loops
var myArray = [āAppleā, āCarā, āTreeā, āCastleā];
var closureArray = new Array();
[code]....
Here we iterate over the length of myArray (4 times), assigning the index of myArray to theItem variable. We also return a function reference to the closureArray during each iteration (closureArray[i]), where i is index number so we assign 4 functon references. So when we iterate through myArray, we immediatelly call the writeItem() fucntion passing an argument of theItem at its current value. This returns a child anonymous function and when that child function is called, it will execute a block that calls the predefined write() method. We assign that returned anonymous function to the variable closureArray. Hence, closureArray holds a reference to that anonymous function. So closureArray during each iteration holds a reference to the anonymous function and we later call closureArray, which in turn calls the anonymous function, therefore calling the predefined write() function to output the local variable of the parent function. This outputs each distinct index of myArray.
This is because since we created the closure, when we call writeItem, passing theItem argument, since theItem is a local variable of the parent function of the closure, it is never destroyed when we later call closureArray (the reference to the child anonymous function)? Yet weren't we using a closure in the first example as well? So whey wasn't those variables preserved?
I don't think it has anything to do with assigning a returned anonymous function to closureArray. Even though an anonymous function creates a new memory position in the javascript engine, therefore not overwriting the other function references we create during the iteration, it's still referring to a local variable declared outside the reference. So if it's about the closure retaining value of parent's local variable even after exiting the parent function allowing for the current indexes to be preserved, then why did the closure in the first example fail to retain each index?
View 7 Replies
View Related
Sep 28, 2005
I had made a form in which dynamic rows are added to a table. Now when i send there values to next page by GETmethod then in between alphabets where space is given + is shown and where new line is there & is shown.
View 9 Replies
View Related
May 31, 2011
Here's the deal: I have a JQuery page in which I'm using AJAX to call a classic ASP back-end. For example purposes, let's call the page "JQuery.asp", and we'll call the back-end "BackEnd.asp".My BackEnd.asp is set up as reusable code, using JQuery.asp as my wrapper.BackEnd.asp includes the following line:
GetID = request("GetID")
So, my JQuery.asp would look like this:
$(document).ready( function () {
[code]....
View 4 Replies
View Related
Oct 5, 2006
I have used PHP to send a variable in the url and I then need to use Javascript to send it on again. How would I pick up the variable? It is passeed as var=x. I am fairly sure I know how to pass it on I jsut need to get this value into a variable.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
I have a problem with the following code. It generates a
<FORM><SELECT><OPTION> list. There is no problem in the generating. The
problem is in the execution as follows.
It works fine in Mac IE with and without the <FORM></FORM>.
In Mac Netscape 6 the onChange does not activate if there is no
<FORM></FORM>. When I put it in a form as indicated below the value of
train.options.value is undefined. What am I doing wrong?
As I said there is no problem in IE and mayby other browsers. It may be
just a Mac Netscape 6 problem. Code:
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 26, 2011
I'm trying to grab a value passed in from a URL, i.e:
test.html?foo=bar
And I would like to grab the "foo" entry, with the value passed in. I'm guessing this can be done, but I can't find a way?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 31, 2011
I've come across functions like the one below in many scripts.I just don't understand the purpose of the parameter! Nothing is being passed into the function when it's being called- so what's the point of specifying an argument???
function doSomething(e) {
if (!e) var e = window.event;
alert(e.type);[code].....
View 8 Replies
View Related
Nov 8, 2010
The problem I am having is when the following script is executed within my page and the user submits the form, the variables passed to the GET array are duplicated only for the inputs created by my script. I have other inputs in the form that are created within the HTML of the page that work fine (i.e. they only try to pass their value once) but I cannot get my script to work properly.
Here is my script:
Here is an example of what the url looks like after the form containing this script has been submitted:
The input (segments) created in my page only submits itself once, while anything created by the script (segment_type_1, segment_type_2, etc.) submits itself twice with the second, blank value overriding the first, correct value.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 9, 2009
I am making a drop down menu in javascript using a function in an external js file. Problem is in FF error console it keeps coming up that my ID that's being called in getElementByID in the function is not defined. Please help if you can, why is saying my ID is undefined??
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 11, 2010
I'm trying to reuse a script I have but, I'm not able to due to the fact I can't use some variables in a function.
I would like to know why I am not able to use passed variables in javascript.
For example: I call a function submit_data( 'newDomainForm', 'add_domain', 'list_div' ), in the function itself I would like to use the form name (first variable passed) as document.form.domain_name.value.
Later on I would like to use the div id: list_div in document.getElementById( div_id ).innerHTML. This doesn't work.
I have to put the name of the actual div like this: document.getElementById( 'result' ).innerHTML
And to get the value of a form element I have to put the actual name like this:
HTML Code:
View 9 Replies
View Related
Jan 6, 2007
I'm calling `setInterval(myfunc, 100);`.
That function receives one parameter which seems to be -3, 0, 3, 6 or 9.
This isn't a problem, but I'm wondering what it is. Does someone know?
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; nl; rv:1.8.1.1) Gecko/20061204
Firefox/2.0.0.1
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 24, 2009
If I have a plugin thats being called...
$('.myClass').somePlugin();
How do I pull out the ".myClass" part inside the plugin?
jQuery.fn.somePlugin = function(o) {
// Defaults
var o = jQuery.extend( {
option1 : 'something',
[Code]....
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 3, 2010
I've made a trivial html page to show my problem. This page should take all of the <tr> tags from the first table, move them into the second table in reverse order, and change each <tr> tag's click handler to print it's internal <td> tag's contents.Unfortunately, the function I've set as the click handler seems to be passing a variable by reference rather than by value. I'm sure this is probably the expected behavior, but is there someway to prevent this behavior?If this doesn't sound very clear, hopefully the code I've included will make more sense:
<html>
<head>
<script type="text/javascript"
[code]....
View 2 Replies
View Related