Is it possible to have something like the following so that 'three'
can access 'one':
var x = {
one: 1,
two: { three:this.one } // Or parent.one ?
}
If not (which I have nearly come to a conclusion on) what is the next
best way to accomplish this?
I have the following code:
A = {
"value": "a",
};
B = A ;
B.value = "b";
alert (A.value); // => b
I expected A.value to be "a". how can I change values of a new object, without changing the parent-object?
I am having a terrible time getting the following code to work:
var foo = {
bar : "bar",
fooTwo : {
bar : foo.bar
}}
When this code runs, I am told that foo.bar does not exist in line 4. Why am
I getting this error?
i want the following var i="name";console.log({i:'value'}); o be equivalent to (as an end result)
var i='name'; var t={}; t[i]='value';console.log(t); is that possible?or must i use the second method?
I'm declaring a class in OLN:
Code:
The problem is that in IE, when I call myfunc() it complains with the error: Class is undefined
I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong. Class is declared in as much global scope as possible, and that shouldn't even matter in JS.
I'm trying to put a function in a object created using JSON notation. The syntax looks like this...
Code:
historySet = { ajaxRunFunction: "updatePageCopy('" + pageID + "','','" + pageName + "')"};
It works fine in FF, but in IE it calls the function updatePageCopy when it creates the object history set. I don't want to call the function when the object is created.
I have difficulty understanding how square brackets work in JavaScript and this is causing me difficulty retrieving the values of the options of my Select controls.
My form contains many select boxes. Their names are stored in variables(in this case concat is the select control name) and I have no trouble accessing methods for the select object ie:
document.Allan.elements[concat].selectedIndex;
I would like to get the value of the selectedIndex but I am having difficulty because I don't know the right syntax. I'm looking for a statement like the one that follows but uses variables
document.form.theDay.options[2].text
Could some one help me use the right syntax?
I've started learning writing javascript objects with literal notation...
Instead of the usual syntax...
The problem is that it's hard for me to adapt procedures which I'm used to within the normal syntax for the literal notation. E.g:
Is this variable global or local? If it's local, how do I declare a variable globally? I also wonder if it is possible to bind events to objects from within the object? And if I'm correct - jQuery is coded this way, but how can they then make use of their selector:
When it is an object defined with literal notation that doesn't have a constructor?
I did some searching around, but didn't see this addressed directly. Here is an example of when dot notation fails in Firefox, and when SetAttribute doesn't fail: Code:
View 4 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to get a return of
[
["red","green","blue"]
,["blue","red","green"]
[code]....
The IE developer toolbar's DOM inspector shows the OBJECT tag and the PARAM
tags inside it, and if I don't have the Javascript in an external file, I'll
get the "click here to activate" tooltip and the border around what is
supposed to be the Flash movie. If I right-click inside the border, I get the
Flash context menu. The movie just doesn't load.
<html><head><title>foo</title>
<script>
function foo() {
AXObject = document.createElement("object");
AXObject.type="application/x-shockwave-flash";
AXObject.data="flashtest.swf";
AXObject.width="200";
AXObject.height="50";
AXObject.style.visibility="visible";
var p=document.createElement("param");
p.name="movie";
p.value="flashtest.swf";
AXObject.appendChild(p);
var p=document.createElement("param");
p.name="quality";
p.value="high";
AXObject.appendChild(p);
document.body.appendChild(AXObject);
}
</script>
</head>
<body id="foo" onload="foo()">
</body>
</html>
Does Javascript supply a function that destroys an object? If so, is there a
dependancy on Javascript version?
I want a page should not maintain history.what code in javascript.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a line which looks like this in PHP:
Code:
<input id="btnCancel$folder_id" type="button" value="Cancel" onclick="swfu.$folder_id.cancelQueue();" disabled="disabled" />
and of course when output looks like this:
Code:
<input id="btnCancel111" type="button" value="Cancel" onclick="swfu.111.cancelQueue();" disabled="disabled" />
It seems that the .111. throws an expected ";" error. swfu.cancelQueue(); by itself does not.
These objects are being defined in a function which takes in the folder ID as a variable, and then builds using this line:
Code:
swfu[folderId] = new SWFUpload(settings);
I want to access the features of a plugin without actually embedding
it into a page. Is this possible? Eg
The code to embed the object into a page is:
<OBJECT classid='CLSID:7FA62735-AHC3-14d2-9F81-00114B3245C5
codebase='http://www.test.com/plug.cab#version=3,1' "id='myPlugin'
height=Ɔ' width=Ɔ'>
<EMBED type='application/x-myPlugin' name='myPlugin' hidden='true'
src='in.txt'></EMBED>
</OBJECT>
I could simply add this using document.write, but for various reasons
I dont want to do this.
I would rather do something like:
var plugin = (navigator.mimeTypes &&
navigator.mimeTypes["application/x-Web-Plugin"]) ?
navigator.mimeTypes["application/x-Web-Plugin"].enabledPlugin : 0;
myObj = new object("CLSID:7FA62735-AHC3-14d2-9F81-00114B3245C5");
myObj.pluginMethod
I have situation that when my page is loaded i create js object
<html>
...
<script>
function Page() {
this.page = 0;
this.result = 0
this.resultCount =1;
this.currentPage =1;
}
MyPage= Page()
</script>
then in my javascript function i use object like this:
function getPage() {
if(!MyPage) {
MyPage = new Page();
}
return MyPage;
}
but there is one problem: MyPage lost one of the property, currentPage.
When i do alert(MyPage.cuurentPage) shows mi undefined. After object
initialization everything seems to be alright, currentPage is set to 1
but when i Try use MyPage in my js code is already set to undefined.
What happen? What I'm doing wrong?
I have the following Javascript code
function Obj()
{
obj.squares = new Array();
}
Obj.prototype.Load= function(xdoc)
{
var goat = "head";
xdoc.ProcessNodes("squares/square", function(node)
{
alert(goat); // <-- this works fine
this.squares.push(
// do processing on node, create a square
);
});
}
Now the xdoc is another object I have, with a method called
ProcessNodes. The only important thing to know about ProcessNodes is
that it does some things, and calls its second argument (which is a
function) successively.
The problem I am running into here is once I get into the callback
function, "this.squares" is returning null ... even though it has been
initialized to an Array. For whatever reason, its like the object loses
scope when I get into the callback function. For all other intents and
purposes however, the callback function has the same scope as the
calling block (i.e. the goat variable is still accessible).
I'm trying to utilized a more object-oriented approach to managing
window events in javascript. Thus, I am creating a "controller" object
to handle events and interact with the server. However, I apparently
don't fully understand what "this" refers to. In the code below I was
expecting that when the button was clicked (handleDeleteButtonClicked
function) that "this" would be pointing at a ViewController object.
Instead it was the Button (HtmlInputElement).
<html>
<head>
<script>
/* Constructor */
function ViewController() {
this.foo = "bar";
}
/* delete button handler */
ViewController.prototype.handleDeleteButtonClicked = function() {
window.alert("delete clicked, this=" + this + " this.foo= " +
this.foo);
};
/* initializer */
ViewController.prototype.initialize = function() {
document.getElementById("delete-button").onclick =
this.handleDeleteButtonClicked;
};
</script>
</head>
<body onload="javascript:new ViewController().initialize();">
<input id="delete-button" type="button" value="Delete">
</body>
</html>
I just released javascript lib that really helps to develop robust and clear js-scenarios following the OOP directions. The library is compatible with wide range of browsers on different platforms, including Netscape 4.x, Netscape 6.x, Netscape 7.x, Opera 6, Opera 7, Mozilla 1.0, IE 4, IE 5, IE 6.
View 3 Replies View RelatedAny websites or good books to learn real heavy object oriented javascript?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am creating a JavaScript object which I want to use to respond to user input on a web page. The object will basically be made up of a constructor and then a selection of functions which will use the DOM to alter the appearance of the page according to the user's input. I am getting stuck because I want a form element that is being created by the object to have an 'onkeyup' event attached to it which will call another function from the same object.
Now, I understand how to attach the 'onkeyup' event to the input element I have created using the DOM. If I tell the event to call a normal function (alert() etc) then it does exactly that. What I am having trouble with is getting the event to call another function from the object that created the input box in the first place. (I don't even know if this is possible / a wise thing to do!). Code:
I have a fairly complex javascript object - containing strings and arrays - which I need to pass along to a second PHP page. Is there a way to pass this object along via POST to be picked apart by the receiving PHP script?
I could dynamically create a form, populate it with the contents of the object, then pass it along via submit(), but frankly that's an awful pain.
I'm having trouble getting the following code to work properly. Every time I try to access the private testing variable from the priveleged MyMethod it gives an error. Says it can't find testing and that it has no properties so I can't run a push() command on it.
function MyClass()
{
var testing = new Array();
// define the method
function MyMethod()
{
this.testing.push("hello");
}
// make the method priveledged
this.MyMethod = MyMethod;
}
// a test function it ensure the variables declared here are isolated
function Start()
{
var myClass = new MyClass();
myClass.MyMethod();
document.write("[" + myClass.testing + "]");
}
Start();
Can someone tell me all the OOP's that can be made from javascript.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have a page (page 1), my page 1 has an IFRAME which loads another page (page 2).
My page 2 has a JavaScript object declared on the page: var MyObject = new Object();
I want to access this object from the parent page (page 1).
I tried:
var TempObj = document.getElementById("MyIFrame");
TempObj.document.MyObject.value = "blah blah";
But it said MyObject didn't exist.
Can someone tell me how to access it in this manner?
I got two ASP pages. One is ASP email form (I'm using Persist ASP
Email component). Another one has all file links in it. For example,
when user click Outlook course hyperlink. It will pop up another
window with outlook course PDF file. (All PDF files are already in the
server).
What I am trying to do is: When user click the "Add Email" hyperlink,
it will add that course name and filepath into ASP/VBScript Dictioanry
Object. After the user finish and click "Attach to email" button. All
the files will be attached in the email as an attachment.
Because I am not familar with VBScript. So, can Javascript add items
to ASP Dictionary Object?