My website has demo music tracks and a Flash player. I've put the site in a frameset so that music continues to play while the user is browsing around.
The Flash player and menu are in a thin horizontal bar along the top of the page (top frame). I just realised that my nice JS drop-down menus are not displaying because of the frame... is there any way of getting them to extend beyond the frame they're contained in ?? Code:
I am currently designing a webpage, and the left fram has a is a 6-cell table that is being used as a navigation tool. The table currently uses Javascript to visually keep track of the current choice and open the specified target fram to the right. My problem occurs when a user has a page open and hits the refresh button. The page refreshes, but the menu bar on left resets to "Home", the default value on loading. Is there anyway so that the page can refresh but the options along top stay the same?
Intention was, when i will click on profile (from my left sided menu) then the linked pages will appear on my right side frame named 'content'. But every time that is giving me the following error:Firefox can't find the file at /C:/Users/Faisal/Desktop/friday/a href=.How to use dTree menu with frame architecture?
I'd like my javascript popup menu link to target the inline frame in the middle of my page, but I'm unsure how to do this. The inline frame is named "mainframe". Here is the code, with the line to the link denoted with **:
if (window.mm_menu_0127203047_0) return; window.mm_menu_0127203047_0 = new Menu("root",140,18,"Tahoma, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif",10,"#ffffff","#ffffff","#ffffff","#243f6f","left","middle",3,0,5 00,-5,7,true,true,true,0,false,true);
i need a DHTML drop down menu sample with framesets used or the cross-frame..i dont have any dropdown menu creator because they are just a trial verion..
I'm looking for a way to add more field depending on the user's input,. e.g. the user inputs ཆ' in the option, and 10 more sets of fields are displayed below on the same page. How do I go about accomplishing this?
I'm embarking on a rather interesting wine cellaring project where I need to enable a user to add form fields (a complete table row with several fields) on demand.
If they start filling out the form and need another row for another bottle, I need them to be able to click a button that adds a new row to the table with the same fields.
I also need perhaps another button that will create the row and duplicate the form field values of that row. The winery, wine namen and variety may be the same but the year may change and I dont wan thte user to have to do any double entry. I've been researching DOM and have been looking at sites like Quirksmode.
Am I heading in the right direction? I'm just about to go an buy a book on DOM and start really getting into it.
I have a domain: example.com; which is the parent.And a subdomain: api.example.com; which page 'receiver.html' is being loaded in an iframe, child of parent. Both pages set document.domain = example.com.
I'm trying to adapt this code:[url] but Idon't want to load jQuery from the <iframe> again but I need to have the method $.ajax() working from the <iframe> otherwise it would be a cross-domain request and the browser would abort it. I tried ingenuously to set via $('iframe')[0].contentWindow.$.ajax = $.ajax() and I just got a shortcut to the parent page jQuery method. I also tried to "clone" it using $.expand (true...) but the method doesn't work for me; probably because of the complexity of the objected I'm trying to clone. So is there a way for me to use jQuery to have only a $.ajax() method in the <iframe> ? I've thought even about creating a XHR in the child-iframe and then use that in the $.ajaxSetup ({xhr: THATNEWXHR}) but I couldn't do it. I mean, I want to use the XHR factory from jQuery (which has fallbacks for IE, etc) but it has to be created from the iframe-child.
Maybe there is other way to make the AJAX call come from the child-iframe.
If you're wondering "why don't you load jQuery from <script> in the child-iframe", there is a reason... As I'm using jQuery plugins + my own custom javascripts + other independent scripts I created a compiler which minifies each file and bundle them in one. The advantage of this is the reduction of HTTP requests. So "why don't you load that bundle inside the child-iframe?", because it's ugly and Twitter doesn't... Yeah, I like to take Twitter as a reference and I think if they were able to make it so can I;
I got to work in most browsers except IE and Operaby doing it with pure javascript.
I'm "attaching" the code for you guys to test. If you open it with Chrome, Safari or Firefox you will receive 2 alerts one with the return of $.get() and another with the return of a request made via XMLHttpsRequest object. Otherwise (if you open it with IE or Opera) you'll get 'undefined' in the first alert but the real return in the second.
Im trying to make a back button that reloads the previous page the user was at. The back button will be on a small top frame and the page that needs to be controlled will be in the main frame.
The top frame is just a navigation system, and all pages will be loaded in the main frame. Im trying to use this Code:
Javascript has a very small math function list. However there is no reason that this list can not be extended greatly. Speed is not an issue, unless you nest complicated calculations several levels deep. In that case you need much more ram than a PC has to store functions calculated in loops so that you do not have to recalculate every time you cycle through the nest of loops. Using a HD for storage to extend ram is much too slow for many applications.
Some functions such as hyperbolic ones are easy to add, since they are just simple combinations of the built in javascript math functions. I have found a few examples on the web such as Bessel functions. I found far fewer javascript math functions than I expected on Google searches. Thus I have had to write several functions of my own.
See http://www.cwdjr.net/math/I0L0andI1L1.html for an example of two "functions from hell" that are very difficult to evaluate. Fortunately there are Fortran programs that can be used as a starting point. I was able to modify the Fortran programs to work on javascript. I have used these functions for technical applications in the past.
The page is set up to reject the NN 4 series, because it will not support some of the script needed such as .toExponential(n) and to.Fixed(n)for writing output in exponential or fixed format. I was amazed that even the old MSNTV(former WebTV) set-top box, that no longer is being made, will even support these output formats. I wonder about IE4. If it will not support these output formats, I can easly block it by checking for document.getElementById.
The code works properly on the latest versions of IE6, MSN9, Firefox, Mozilla, Netscape, and Opera. I am not selling anything, so for a special interest page such as this, I see no need to support older browsers.
The advantage of doing math with javascript is that it is so portable. You can do it anywhere you can use a computer, or you can do it on your own local computer offline. There are several math programs for PCs that will do very much more than you can hope to do with javascript. Unfortunately the program I would like costs about US$ 1800. Also there are versions you can install on a server, but these also are expensive.
I am trying to create an HTML form in which user will enter different items (he wants to purchase) in text fields. One text field is used for one item. Now it is not known in advance how much items the user will purchase so we cannot decide the total text fields required in advance. Is is possible to increase the number of text fields (using JavaScript) one by one if the user requires more fields
How do I extend both the table and the input form? Ultimately, I want it to look like this: _____________________________ |header |header |header |header | | INPUT | INPUT | INPUT | INPUT | Add Row of Inputs Link _____________________________ |header |header |header |header | | INPUT | INPUT | INPUT | INPUT | | INPUT | INPUT | INPUT | INPUT | Add Row of Inputs Link
I know how to make the html row by using getElementById() or so and I know how to make an input field by createElement() but how do I create and append(?) them together, specifically the multiple input fields inside of the html row?
I want to have a main image in place and when you click on 1 of the 3 frame options the frame changes showing a preview. Also I would like the add to cart button change its code to add the correct item as well.
var parent_child = function(po, ps, co, cs){ var url = 'http://xyz.com/abc/'; var pars = [], childs = {}, tmp; this.p_added = function(urlFrag){
[Code]....
What i want to do is to create a new class with the above one as the super class, pass in one more variable to the constructor and override the p_added function. I thought of doing something like xpc = new parent_child(); and override the function with xpc.prototype.p_added = function(){}
how to pass in another variable to the constructor and make it private to the new class.
I believe there is a nice and concise way to achieve what i want to, but i can't find it. And the fact that OOP in javascript can be implemented in several different ways doesn't help my cause.
A client is using an analytics tracking script that needs to be updated each time the DOM is modified (ie, an element is added or removed). Basically this script allows the client to track user actions on the site (clicks, mouseovers, etc.) and, if the user is having issues, replay the entire session to help them with their problem. The issue we're running into is that this tracking script takes a cache of the DOM tree on page load, and when the DOM is updated it needs to specifically be notified that there has been a change... or else the script won't be able to see the nodes that have been added/removed.
Assuming all DOM manipulation is done using jQuery functions, is there a way to run some function every time the DOM is manipulated? I've noticed that all the DOM manipulation functions seem to run through the internal $.fn.domManip function, so I was wondering if it's possible to extend or replace this function from another JS file (assuming of course that all the manipulation functions DO in fact run through $.fn.domManip)?
Example (don't take this code seriously, it's more meant to illustrate what I'm trying to do): var oldDomManip = $.fn.domManip; //Copy the function (I know this isn't right) $.fn.domManip = function() { oldDomManip(arguments); //update the analytics program by calling it's update function here... }
I'm writing a plugin for jQuery for catching 2 succesive keypresses. I'll paste the plugin I wrote below It doesn't work on Opera . The Developer tools of Opera gave no errors and I can't find any problems, it just doesn't work.(I've used Opera 10.0). o it only works on Firefox (tested on 3.0.14). I'm curious if there is a way to find out why it's not working on Opera and to fix it.
I was wondering if there are any sites dedicated to ending javascript objects using the prototype property to give them features like trimming string, removing elements of arrays by name, removing duplicates in arrays, etc. Granted I have functions to do this but there's probably a ton of other good ones out there. Most things I've seen are frameworks like JQuery (which is awesome) but it doesn't extend these objects.
I'm sure this question has been asked many times before, but I can't seem to get the correct terms to find the answer in Google.I understand basic JavaScript inheritance. However, everything I've read makes the inheritance work something like this:
Code JavaScript: var ChildClass = new Function(); ChildClass.prototype = new ParentClass(); ChildClass.constructor = ChildClass;
That's fine, but what happens when ParentClass's constructor needs parameters?As an example, look at the following code:
Code JavaScript: function Furniture(color){ this.color = color;[code)....
How could I "copy" Furniture's constructor into the Chair object? Better yet, how could I copy Furniture's constructor and then add some functionality to it?
i need to pass the data in the textfields from the left frame to the textfields in the right frame of my frameset. (ex: dslnum of frame1 will be pass to txtDSLTN of frame2)[URL]
I have two frames (frameset, let's call it frame1 and frame2). Frame1 has links..., and frame2. When some link in frame1 is clicked, it must be changed content of the frame2. Here's example: click. How to do that? (I don't see any javascript code)
I have a parent document that has a frameset with two frames in it. The first frame is a "header" that runs across the top of the site, and never changes. The second frame contains the "content" of the site. Essentially, I am trying to figure out how to prevent the header appearing above external sites when the user clicks an external link in the "content" frame.
Every time the content frame changes to a new URL, I would like the check that URL and determine if the content frame is changing to an external URL (i.e. different domain in URL) or to an internal link (same domain in URL). If the content is changing to an external link, I want to break out of the frame and just load that external link in the top most document.
I would like all of my javascript to be in the parent document, not spread throughout the individual pages of the site. I was trying to approach this by setting the onunload event handler of the content frame, but I am left with a couple of specific questions: 1. In handling an unload event, can you determine the next URL that the document is loading? Code:
I have a little problem, I structure my site with a main page index.html with a frame in the central whit name CENTRALE, so every other page I will open within this frame. Now I need to have a direct link to these internal pages, give an example I wish it were possible to go to the page clothing giving a direct link to that section of the site type www.indirizzo.com / clothing.html because the state of things if I take the 'direct address to that page I open only the part inside of the frame, but I wish I would open inside the "main frame, there is a solution in javascrip to overcome this problem?
In the spirit of the season, I wanted to make it snow on my website. So I began digging. Eventually I ended up with a script that moved an image element down the page in a snowflake-like manner. The problem with it was it was dependant on an img element for every flake - simply no poor programming when using an Object Oriented programming language.So I decided I wanted to extend (in Java-speak; most of my programming background is in Java) the in-built Image object. The new object's src variable will lead to an image of the type of flake it is. (I want to be able to have more variance in images than a simple dot.) The new object will have a function that will allow it to move.A separate,unrelated function will control when each flakes move.
I did some more research and read about prototyping on JavaScript Kit and here (http://mckoss.com/jscript/object.htm), but I still cant seem to get this to work. JS Lint says it's bug-free, but Firefox says "move()" is an invalid function. I am presuming the problem lies in my inability to fully grasp how to extend objects in JavaScript.
I am working wiht this JQuery plug in that now one of my clients wants to turn it into a slideshow feature. I am not that familiar with JQuery plug ins so I wanted to get some input from some of you.