the image is like <img style="filter:progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.AlphaImageLoader (src='aa.png')" ... > $('img').css('filter') will get progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.AlphaImageLoader(src='aa.png') Can I get the aa.png directly?
I wirte a simple sample to alert 'here' when catch submit event. The code as below. When I press submit button , it works fine. But when I press b3 button , it will call a function to submit the form. The form submit is ok , but it will not alert 'here'.
This is slightly off topic, but if anybody can solve this, it'll be this mailing list. The basic question is: Is there a way to catch an error thrown in an external js library so that I can continue parsing the remaining javascript on the page? The more detailed version is this: I'm using DotNetNuke (DNN) for my website. A module that I'm using include Scriptaculous, DotNetNuke uses a mixture of jQuery and MS AJAX. To avoid namespace pollution, the DNN folk have used the jQuery prefix for jQuery functions and the $ shortcut for MS AJAX (actually, I think this is the only way you can do this). The third party module uses $ to reference Scriptaculous. I think we all know where this is going: the namespace pollution of $ causes an error to be thrown very early on, leaving parts of my page unstyled (cornerz), dates unformatted, etc, etc, etc. The good news - for me - is this only happens when an admin is logged in. My thought would be to catch the errors and continue parsing <i>my </i>portion of the page.
I'm trying to load some javascript files via ajax, I can't get it to catch 404 errors. I've tried searching, but everything I've found says that I should check the status on the request object to catch it but it's not even getting that far.
I've tried:
I would try $.getScript, but that appears to have no way of handling errors. I've even tried just doing a console.info("test") -- it doesn't even do that. Firebug shows a 404 error (obviously) but the error doesn't seem to be being caught? I'm loading jquery through the google api, version 1.3.2.
I'm using the jquery cycle plugin. the entire page is a slide show. Its working pretty well so far but now i want the body background to change as the slide changes.Is there someway to us .live() to catch the event, and then dynamically change the body background?
I've got a problem with a jQuery slider I'm using on a website I'm currently developing (temporarily hosted at [URL]. Generally it looks and functions as I'd like it to, but it seems to have a problem when you're looking at other tabs/websites in your web browser. When you come back to the slider having been looking at something else for a minute or so, the slider effectively plays catch up and quickly scrolls through the slides faster than usual until it catches up with the position it would have been in had you not have been looking at another tab and left it to run. This seems to happen in all web browsers as far as I can tell.
I would like to copy/clone the html DOM from "id1" to variable "tblContent",and remove the tag "<script>" and "<a>" from variable "tblContent", then append the html DOM to "id2" but not working...any error of my code? [code]
I would to achieve the same result of the below function without using callbacks . The function is: $("#user-options-menu").find('a').each(function() { // now I want to filter any <a> tag with <li> parent if (!($(this).parent().is('li'))) { $(this).button(); }}); I've tried with$("#user-options-menu").find('a:not(li:parent)') but without result.
I wish to display a list of people on my website. These people are speakers who have different talents, or features. Male, female, high voice, low voice, german, english, persian, austrian ... a whole bunch of people. And I want to let my user use checkboxes to narrow down the speakers he could use for his production.
Here's the output filtering list (not complete, just rudimentary while I try to make it work)
My problem : I want to start with all checkboxes selected, showing all the people in this speakerpool, then narrow down as checkboxes get unchecked. This works well with combinations such as ".male .voice-low" which effectively removes all females and the other voices, I found here where I learned that is(".class1,.class2") is different to is(".class1.class2")
But, if I say, I want all english speakers, no matter if male or female, and I check male and female, I get none, since there is no speaker that is both male and female. At least not that I know of
Same issue with the voice-levels: most speakers either speak high or low or medium, yet I'd want to be able to check all those and get a comprehensive list, then.
My Question : Is there a way I can separate classes into class-groups or something? Maybe use prefixes like "sex-male, sex-female, language-english, language-german" and jQuery then uses the prefixes to check if they're supposed to be additive (?) or exlusive.
I am trying to show the data from XML with categories (catalog name="Employee Services"), i want to filter the data before the display of each services, this pls
my xml <catalog name="Employee Services" order="1" color="#CC0033" image="srv_emp.gif"> <service>
I have an xml file that is dynamically generated at periodic intervals onto disk. the information contained in this file is displayed in a vertical scroller and this works fine. I however need to filter the data based on the logged-in users preferences. These preferences are stored in a database and retrieved after the user logs in. Only data in the xml file that match the user's preferences must be displayed.
I am trying to do something that seems very simple, but can not get to work! Basically, I want to find an element whose ID equals a certain value, as represented by a variable. The variable is derived from a dropdown list. Here is my code:
$(document).ready(function(){ $("select").change(function() { var myClr = $("select").val();[code]....
I am wondering if it is legal to use a variable within the filter - if I replace it with an actual ID value it works fine, but when I substitute the variable name nothing happens.I am sure I am doing something dumb.
Is there a more concise way to do something like the the desired code below?
The gripe is with the try-catch syntax. It takes *way* too many lines of code to evaluate a conditional expression when zero or more parts of the conditional expression may trigger an error. In this case, the trigger is a call to a non-defined (null) object.
In other words, how can you do a more simple 'try' statement that simply spits out true or false, depending on whether the 'tried' code threw an error or not?
Defining a function don't seem to work because you can't pass the 'try' code as an argument. Extending the 'Global' constructor is not an option, so now what? Code: