I developed web application which contains script validations in most of the html pages in these validations i used document.forms[0] its working fine in IE , but my problem now i need to execute this application in FireFox browser,but FireFox is not supporting document.forms[0], how to make generalised to handle document.forms[0] in all browsers.
View 9 RepliesI have a JSP page with several forms on it. Some of these forms are
generated dynamically, and each of them submits some information to a
database.
Handling one form is easy, as I can simply make the form post to
itself, and handle the
data using a single bean. Since I have multiple forms, I now have a
problem. Several of the forms on the page handle the same type of data
(same input names), and a 'setproperty *' call for each of the form
beans would change data in several beasn, not just the form/bean that
sent the data.
I am attempting to write a separate JSP with a single bean that
handles a form submission. However, I'm not sure how to make this page
go back to the referring page from which the data was submitted.
I have a form with the same structure being loaded in 3 tabs. Now during validation, I will have issues with the IDs of the form fields. Now is it possible to disable the forms in tab 1 and tab 3 when tab 2 is clicked.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am using facebox to display a contact form, however when the user selects submit I would like the action which for this example I shall call action="contact_send.php" to also open in a facebox. Currently it is easy to open a link into a facebox by declaring the rel attribute as facebox [code]This opens contact.html in a facebox window, I would however like the action of this form to also open in a lightbox.
View 7 Replies View Relatedwe are developing a site and have just discovered our forms are not working in Firefox, they all run perfectly in Internet Explorer etc? Is there something we need to change with our coding? :thumbsup: Form 1: [URL] Form 2: [URL]
View 2 Replies View RelatedI'm using the autofill forms plugin for firefox which can be found here: [URL]. I use it to automatically fill various web forms. But I would like certain values to be chosen randomly from a list I create. I contacted the developer and he said the add on probably does not need a new feature because there is a 'dynamic tags' function to fill certain forms with dynamic values (e.g. the current time or date). He has given over the project to another developer and told me I probably would find a solution in a good javascript programming forum.
Basically, I just need a javascript code which chooses on item from an array randomly, I guess? Here are sample dynamic tags from the plugin:
<datetime> new Date().toLocaleString()
<useragent> navigator.userAgent
<langcode> navigator.language
<resolution> screen.width+'x'+screen.height
<clipboard> this.getClipboardText()
I have a javascript function which lets a user to choose one of the 7 option buttons on a "mainsub.asp" page and the page will then be forwarded to one of the 7 process pages depending on what has been chosen. The problem is that firefox is angry with the first line ("if" statement) and tells the following in its error console:
[Code]...
I want to make few forms but 1 submit button. I want to do 1 page , 5 forms , 1 submit button so when i click on the submit button it will send the 5 forms as 1 form.
View 2 Replies View Relatedhow to add forms in javascript, but it's limited to text input forms.
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
function updatesum() {
document.form.sum.value = (document.form.sum1.value -0) + (document.form.sum2.value -0);
}
//--></script>
Where the inputs sum1 and sum2 are text fields you put whatever numbers you want in. That works fine. Great. Now what I'm having trouble with is modifying the code so that it will add one form with an input number with a form that spits out a randomly generated number.
<input type="button" value="D20" onclick="this.form.display.value = Math.round (20 * Math.random())" class="buttonHi" /> <input name="display" type="text" size="6" value="" />
This is what I'm using for my random number generator. So basically I want to be able to put, say, 5, into the input text field above this. And then click on the d20 button to get a random number, say, 15, and then have the first code add the inputted 5 with the randomly generated 15.
I'm looking for tutorials or articles considering HTML Frames and how to
handle them with Javascript.
E.g. samples how Frames can exchange information, can a Frame instruct
other Frame to update it's content etc.
We have some date fields in our HTML forms in various places. In the
accounts package we use, there is some pretty nifty date handling.
It has a standardised date format of dd/mm/yyyy and if you enter e.g.
3-12 it will switch it to 3/12/2005
Same applies for e.g. 3:12 etc
Anyone know of some javascript which will do this for our HTML form
fields? Our target format is actually dd-mon-yyyy and it would make it
really nice for users if the system could accept a variety of input
formats and then switch it to a date to our specification. Any
suggestions?
I have few textfields and dropdowns in my jsp, form is submitted on
clicking an image link.
In case there is an error for instance some text field is left empty,
then message is displayed below respective fields ( using spans, inner
html). The message is displayed onblur event of the field. So if there
was an error then message is displayed, now if the user corrects the
error and clicks the link then first the message disaapears ,which is
desired ,but he has to click again to submit the form. please suggest a
way to handle this. So that user doesn't have to click the link twice
to submit the form.I tried having onmousedown and onfocus events on
image , but then sometimes the form was submitted twice which gave
backend errors.
I have a piece of simple code which take the user inputs and depending which check box is selected directs them to a different page.
<form name="allform">
<input type="radio" name="allsearch" value="Weaksearch">
<font face="Arial,Helvetica" >Weak </font><br>
<input type="radio" name="allsearch" value="Pinsersearch">
<font face="Arial,Helvetica" >Pinser </font><br>
<input type="radio" name="allsearch" value="Brutesearch">
<font face="Arial,Helvetica">Brute note </font> <br>
<input type="radio" name="allsearch" checked
value="gogsearch">
<font face="Arial,Helvetica">Google</font> <br>
<input type=text name=allsearchtext size=10 maxlength=255>
<input type="button" onClick="locateall(this)" value="Go"
name="button">
</form>
This works but the user needs to hit the go button, if they just hit return the text field is emptied, I would like if the user hits ENTER, the search begins.
I believe I can add something similar as
if (window.event.keyCode == 13)
But I am not sure how to incorporate it in the form?
I am struggling to find definitive information on how IE 5.5, 6 and 7
handle character input (I am happy with the display of text).
I have two main questions:
1. Does IE automaticall convert text input in HTML forms from the
native character set (e.g. SJIS, 8859-1 etc) to UTF-8 prior to sending
the input back to the server?
2. Does IE Javascript do the same? So if I write a Javascript function
that compares a UTF-8 string to a string that a user has inputted into
a text box, will IE convert the user's string into UTF-8 before doing
the comparison?
I think that the answer to question 1 is probably "YES", but I cannot
find any information on question 2!
Geeting a JS error from IE 6 only in this method: handle: function( event ) { var all, handlers, namespaces, namespace, events;
[Code]...
On the last line of the code snippet above. It appears to me that IE6 doesn't like the fact that the events object is undefined. To trigger this error we are doing a simple blur binding to an input box. ex:
$(field).bind('blur', function(){onfocusout(this);}); It appears IE 6 stops executing JS after the error (imagine that). Is this an issue in jQuery core or BTW I know MS has dropped IE 6 support but we still have customers.
I have javascript calculating the total price of all the products in a shoppping cart. The prices are in the format of 10.99 or 5.50 or 10 ete.g if there are five items bought for 10.99 and 1 bought for 10, the script will multiply 10.99 by 3, then multiply 10 by one, then add the two results.
The resulting number is sometimes right, but quite often it ads an extra '000000002' or so to the amount??
[Code]...
a common task when writing multi-use functions, is deciphering the type of data passed to the function.
Javascript's built-in data identification methods complicate function writing, by imposing a "20 questions" style interogation to determine the actual, useful to a programmer, type.
they also slow down functions, requiring both a function execution and a comparision operation upon every type guess.
a common method is something like:
if(typeof x=='string'){ };
but this has several limitations. for example:
x=[1,2,3];
typeof x; //returns 'object'
safely catching an undefined is often done like:
if(typeof x != 'undefined' ){ };
my function making got a lot easier after writing these simple prototypes:
String.prototype.type="string";
Array.prototype.type="array";
Number.prototype.type="number";
Boolean.prototype.type="boolean";
Date.prototype.type="date";
Object.prototype.type="object";
RegExp.prototype.type="regexp";
Function.prototype.type="function"
if(!!window.XML)XML.prototype.type="xml";
String.prototype.isString=1;
Array.prototype.isArray=1;
Number.prototype.isNumber=1;
Boolean.prototype.isBoolean=1;
Date.prototype.isDate=1;
Object.prototype.isObject=1;
RegExp.prototype.isRegExp=1;
Function.prototype.isFunction=1;
if(!!window.XML)XML.prototype.isXML=1;
the result?
shorter simpler code.
examples:
// smarter object typin':
[1,2,3].type; //returns 'array'
//when expecting a string or array possibility:
y=x.isString?x:x.join();
//more-flexible event handling:
function doBold(elm){ //accepts element object or id string...
if(elm.isString){elm=document.getElementById(elm);}
elm.style.fontWeight="bold";
}//end doBold
// detect an undefined variable:
if( ! x.type){ alert('x is undefined')};
by tucking the protos in your script file, you get simpler, faster-executing code. (for a tiny bit of overhead)
if script length is of upmost concern (as in a bookmarklet), these smaller protos give you simpler typing: (without the speed benefits...)
Object.prototype.type=function(){return typeof this;};
//usage:
switch(x.type()){
case 'string': return x;
case 'date': return x.toLocaleString();
case 'array': return x.join('
');
default: return x.toString();
}//end switch;
//another one:
Object.prototype.isType=function(strType){return (!! typeof this === strType)};
//usage:
x=101;
x.isType('string'); //returns false
x.isType('number'); //returns true
I have two div elements (both dynamically created, one within the other). The parent div has an event attached to it:
contextmenuDIV.onmouseout = function () {doSomething()}
for example. However the onmouseout event will fire when you mouseover the child div as (of course) I am technically leaving the div layer (despite it being the parent).
Is there anyway to cancel this? I've read all about bubbling and all that, but it's just confusing me even more!
Anyway, at all, to allow me to have divs within another div element but only allow the event to fire for the parent!
why I should use the dom level 2 event handling over inline events like ...
Code HTML4Strict:
<a href="http://www.yahoo.com" onClick="myFunction()">click me</a>
I work in a team of developers and our pages are dynamically created using Java.I can at any moment change the inline JS across a site due to this so changes are easier then if the site was just static HTML.As far as reasons to use dom 2 over inline, I looking for something beyond:
it separates behavior from html
it is a best practice
it is the 'modern' way of doing it
I need facts that explain why it is a best practice or why 'modern' is better like : you can only assign one function action to the event.That was just an example which I see but is not true to me.I can either assign multiple functions to it like:
Code HTML4Strict:
<a href="http://www.yahoo.com" onClick="myFunctionA();myFunctionB();myFunctionC()">click me</a>
or I can call my functions from a single function call like
Code HTML4Strict: <a href="http://www.yahoo.com" onClick="myMultiFunctionCall()">click me</a>
and then have a function defined before the inline call like
Code JavaScript:
function myMultiFunctionCall()
{[code].....
Here the second statement overwrites the first.By the way, here is a con for using dom and to me a big one considering debugging: you can't see what event handlers are assigned to what unlike inline where it is obvious because it is in the page. see http:[url].......
I am working on this web site with some of the pages at a different domain name. It is actually one web site, but some of the pages are at a different domain name (different root, too) although the IP address is the same.
Basically, there is one main window, and a pop-up window. They need to "talk" to each other - mainly access properties to see what page they are on.
As, the web site is on two domain names, there is a security problem when the pop-up window tries to read properties in the main window, or vice versa.
Is there anyway to share information between the two? Or is it hopeless?
The following bit of javascript writes and retrieves a cookie which counts a users visits to the page. Then using swfobject it both embeds main_banner.swf and passes the cookie value "visits" to it via flashvars. The trouble is in the actionscript below; the vallue has been passed (this is certain, because the .swf shows up rather than the alternative content)- but the .swf is stuck on the first frame rather than processing the cookie and sending the user to the appropriate frame label.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am having a list (ul) in which a mouse over will populate its sub categories as list under that(like tree) and so on. My problem is, when passes mouse over a 2nd or 3rd level element, 2 mouse over events will be fired (The actual one and its parent) The sample code is given below
HTML Code:
<ul>
<li>
Root[code]............
How can I have a button with onclick that calls a function which returns a true/false based on the associated input, and based on the return value shows a message that it was true or false. I see how onclick can call one function, but is there a way to call two functions and use the return value of one of the functions?
[Code]....
I am using IFRAMES to load 3rd party domains in my website. I am facing
few problems using IFRAMES in IE and Firefox.
1) I am unable to login into the 3rd party website within the IFRAME.
Is there any solution to overcome this issue?
2) Upon clicking a link inside 3rd party wesite within the IFRAME, the
resulting page is not loading within the IFRAME, it is going out of
scope. For example clicking MyMail link in yahoo.
Couple questions for the jQuery internals-aware folks. This is a bit long, sorry for that. I'm working on beefing up error handling in a web application. I want to ensure that I'm catching all exceptions and handling them via my own UI system. The window.onerror function is part of the solution,
[Code]...
A client of mine is trying to integrate one of his Web systems with my system. In an essence, he wants to embed my system's web UI into his "master" web page, and display it in a sub-frame whenever a user requests my system display.My system (JBoss AS) has Basic Authentication enabled. So if a user attempts to access my system he/she is prompted to provide username/password. If correct credentials are provided, then user is allowed access to my system / web pages.Now, the client is trying to automate the login. He wants to provide the login information automatically, through JavaScript in his master page (this is needed so that users of his system don't provide any credentials - all user/pwd information is passed under the curtains).What is wrong in the approach above and do you know if there is a better way to properly implement this seamless logging (knowing that Basic Authentication is the only option)?
View 1 Replies View Related