I have some carousel code that I include on a page that has one carousel. Well, now we need to have two carousels with different content. So, instead of me having to recreate dbl data, I am curious how I can retrofit my current code to that I can objectify it for reusability.
[code].....
I am trying to reuse a popup in my application. The reused popup also
opens another popup. From this final popup I then try and reference a
function located in the window that origionally opened the reused
popup. This works fine in IE but doesn't in FireFox. Looking at the
code through the Javascript debugger in FireFox it tells me that the
reused popup's opener is closed even though it is still open. Is this
a bug with FireFox or just bad practice?
I'm trying to reuse some code in a different context to do a different job.The code to be reused contains hundreds of lines similar to a = new b.c.d(e,f) with different value for e and f.I need to create a new user defined object with the structure b.c.d. I've made numerous attempts along the lines of:
function d (e, f) {
this.e = e;
this.f = f;
}
[code]....
with various permuations of functional declarations.However I get error message "Object expected" or "b.c.d is null or not an object" at the final line of the example.It works with the test line var a = new d("test", "message") but not when I start to build up the expression.How should I define of b.c.d?
I want to use the datepicker for multiple fields in a form however I don't know how to have it re-use the settings for multiple fields. For example, I have a form with 4 different fields for dates. I want to use the same datepicker formatting for each field. So instead of having to do something like this
[Code]..
Seeing the examples I have noted that you always use lambda functions. Is there any reason for that? why you don't make something like this:
I think is more clear than:
And we can edit and reuse the function easily, also if you are using an editor like Netbeans you can see all your functions in a list.
Even more, I think in some situations is faster a closure because we are not creating a new object every time we pass the function:
Is there any reason for chosing lambda functions?