Is DHTML a language? or is it a composition of JavaScript and css? Does Java(not javascript) has something to do in it?
What is actually the best to create client-side dynamic pages? I know JAVA is used to create applets but I am not sure of wich is the most powerful....
Also, wich are the newer versions of all the above languages?
I am trying to call a java method from within my Javascript, but cannot seem to get it to work. All the examples I have found online and in the forums are using Java applets. I have a method that I want to call that does a search, and produces a message dialog displaying the results. Also, the class file lives next to the html file. How would I invoke this in my code? This is what I have now:
This may be more of a Java question, but I feel that JavaScript experts may be more qualified to help me find a solution.
In short: is it possible to call a Java method from JavaScript, passing as an argument a JavaScript array (in my case, an array of doubles)?
Supposing I have array x containing only doubles, I have tried: document.MyApplet.myMethod(x);
But the method only ever seems to receive "null" as an argument. Conversely, if I try this with a String, or a single character, or almost anything else, there isn't a problem. Any ideas?
I'm doing an intranet with a media part. So im must be able to upload files on a ftp server AND have a record of informations about this file and meta date in a MySQL database, shown in a php page.
So the first thing i was doing was:
1/ * A HTML Form, with a <input type="file"> which was uploading the file to the web server. And then, in the next action-php-page, using ftp functions from php to upload to the ftp server. But this make upload the file 2 times, which slow, and the user can't do anythig except waiting in front of a blanck loading page.
=> no way
(BTW, the site admin refuse that the ftp server and the web server to be the same computer)
So i tried something else:
2/ * A HTML form, the user enter meta data about the media, click next, and then, a php page which loads a java applet an pass informations to it (by param tags). The applet have a browse button, and a go button, which start the transfert (JDK 1.4.1) trough the URLConnection. The file is uploaded once, and there is a progress bar, which is wonderful.
But now, i need the src_file information wich is the java applet. So i have two options:
A/ I make a post to the webserver from the applet. But i'm using session identification (needed for tracing users actions) and i'm gonna use SSL in less than one month, so i think it would be complicated.
B/ I export the information from the java applet to javascript, and then to HTML hidden field, so that the user can submit the full-hidden-filled form. But i can't make LiveConnect works.
i'm under Mac OS X 10.2 (jaguar) so i need to make work LiveConnect on both Safari 1.0 (v85.6), mozilla 1.5, and Mac OS IE (5.2).
I am writing a java application as a mozilla extension. Because mozilla uses javascript for the frontend, i need the javascript to call my external java application and pass one parameter to it.
I am looking at a client’s site that has a scrolling text bar at the bottom of the page for latest news. I have been asked to recommend whether they keep the scrolling text as a java applet or whether they make it dhtml with Javascript to make it scroll.
To be honest, I’m not sure whether there really is an important difference, in terms of download time, likelihood of working (if client browsers are better enabled for one verses the other), or whether there are any other reasons one should be used over the other.
From the common user perspective (like my grandma), why would they care if its a java applet or an ajax application? Say I want to make a chat system on my website...If i'm doing really involved Comet push-style data communication, and rendering everything using DHTML, why would users prefer that over a java applet?
Moreover, say I use a java applet to transfer data through a socket connection, then use DHTML to display the data, so that basically the front end is the same, but the backend is differs, why would a user prefer the comet-style programming over applet?
I'm asking because I wrote an Ajax chat system through polling, and I want to switch to a Comet push-style system because polling just isn't responsive enough. I want to know if I can avoid Comet (since it is alot of overhead for the server) and just use an applet in the background to transfer data through socket connections, then use DHTML to render the chat boxes.
I have a web application that has a few div tags in the base index.html and calls a java app for the output to the div tags. All is working ok, except when I try to format a ms-excel document as output from the java (to the div tag). If I invoke the java app directly in a web browser, the excel popup window comes up and my output goes to an excel document. However, if I invoke the java app (using Ajax request/response) I get the output to the div tag and the excel popup does not come up. Is this something special/different I need to do when using a div tag/Ajax?
Ok so, this is my purpose: - to be able to load asynchronously (via AJAX) some javascript ads (like google's or adbrite) so as to make them be loaded in the background, then update the page after the ads have loaded via innerHTML
Why? -Because 90% of the time in my newer sites, javascript ads are the major offender in terms of speed of page rendering
My problem: Via ajax, I can call a php file that retrieves some javascript and outputs it, XMLhttprequest returns those javascript lines, but they don't render in the page, since they miss the whole page loading, and are apparently not parsed For example, let's say I call a php file via ajax, and it returns the output into a variable named "text" containing "document.write('hello')" if I use xxx.innerHTML=text, nothing happens
My 1st solution: Passing those javascript lines to eval() [like eval(text) ], but this produces a second problem, that I couldn't solve (probably because of my lack of knowledge in javascipt): if I eval the code, it deletes my current page and renders a new one for example, if I parse a document.write, my page disappears, and a new one is rendered with the document.write text
What I want is basically to make that "document.write" appear inside a div in my page, adding to the content (and not overwriting the whole page), much like what happens when using innerHTML
Is this even possible? How would you go about it? I tried xxx.innerHTML=eval(outputfromphpfile) but it overwrites my whole page...
I am using Ajax to refresh a DIV area by setting the innerHTML=request.responseText in the usual manner. in the response text I have a <SCRIPT> tag in line, but this is not executed. Is there a way of making the ajax refresh process this.
If the browser disable the javascript, what happen to Ajax? can i slove the problem by using server side script? any suggestion for this?
i currently do some dirty projects with perl/cgi, and I would like to add more client side features which relate to ajax, and do some validation on the client side with javascript. but it is possible that the javascript may be disable with some browsers. what can i do if the client's broweer disable the javascript.
I'm interested in learning Javascript with an eye towards using it for client-side user interfaces for web services, and I have a couple questions.
First -- In reading some of the archives here, I've noticed a fairly strongly held opinion that it is better to write purpose-built Javascript than to use large libraries. Since this was what I was planning on doing anyway, because of the size of the libraries and compatibility quirks with Safari, it's nice to hear confirmation from experts. That said, is the code in Prototype, Scriptaculous, and OpenRico good enough to be worth reading and emulating?
Second -- I do much better with dead-tree references than with the web, especially as a lot of the links that come up when I google for Javascript topics are tutorials for the clueless by the clueless. (Perl has the same problem, but with Perl I have enough knowledge to filter the useful bits from the flat-out wrong bits.) Aside from the O'Reilly Javascript reference (which I have) and _Ajax Hacks_ (which I also have), are there other good references I should get my hands on?
Some servers return JavaScript as the response to an AJAX request. When the response JavaScript is eval'ed it calls other JavaScript functions already in the browser to update elements, etc. This seems like a good system because it allows so much freedom in creating the desired behavior in the browser. The required data doesn't have to be converted to XML or JSON on the server. The browser doesn't have to have templates for interpreting and converting this data into some change in the browser. All of the conversion algorithms don't have to be written and changed when new behavior is required. This remote procedure call approach is the predominant system in the Ruby on Rails world. (Unfortunately they are calling Prototype.js functions.)
However apparently some people seem to think this remote procedure call approach is a bad idea. I can't see why it is so bad because it is so lightweight and flexible. It also helps to keep the client less intellegent which seems good in a world of incompatible client-side bugs.
If I use some neutral data format like XML to accomdate different types of clients then I have to write different client-side interpreters for each type of client (browser, RSS, POP, cell phone, etc). Why not just write different server-side code that generates the correct JavaScript (or other) for the requesting client type?
I'm making an ajax call to return the contents for a page using the responseText property. I want to be able to define a javascript function in the page and call it, doing something like:
<script> function test(){ alert('hi'); } test(); </script>
However, none of the javascript in my page works. I'd imagine it has something to do with it being included as part of the responseText and the browser is not picking it up. I haven't been able to find any info about this online anywhere. Any thoughts?
I am currently creating a social network. On a profile if a user has comments they can delete them. I am running AJAX to update the database and display the comments refreshed (one deleted will no longer show). The data I am requesting includes the following...
My problem is that the JavaScript from the request does not work, I can only seem to display regular HTML. Is there a solution to this problem to make the JavaScript work or do I have to use an HTML alternative?
Is it just me, or is there no distinction between AJAX and Javascript nowadays? Today I saw a request for a calculator, something that should be done with just Javascript, but yet the post was seeking an AJAX developer. When did these terms become synonymous?
In my browser, I make an AJAX request. The server sends me a fragment of an HTML document. That fragment has some JavaScript inside some script tags. How do I run these scripts when the fragment arrives at the browser?